Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2011, 6:58 am
United States) that also had cut back on the concept of exclusion. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
In this case, Price Trucking Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 7:30 pm
Inter partes review is a provision of the American Invents Act (AIA) to challenge the validity of a patent before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in the United States Patent and Trademark Office.link: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ptab-invalidates-lucerne-biosciences-813-patent-for-the-treatment-of-binge-eating-disorder-with-lisdexamfetamine-dimesylate-300098752.htmlNote also: … [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
In this case, Price Trucking Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 7:07 pm
The Court was asked to review Ninestar Technology Co. v United States International Trade Commission, to determine whether the first sale doctrine would apply to products protected by patents similarly to the way in which Kirtsaeng applied it to copyright products. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 10:00 pm
”In response, the Smiths filed claims against the landlord in the United States District Court of Colorado alleging wrongful discrimination predicated upon sexual identity, familial status, and sexual orientation.After a motion for summary judgment, the court found the owner liable for discrimination in violation of the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act and the Federal Fair Housing Act (FHA). [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:06 am
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida dismissed the amended complaint. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:30 am
Dixon and the Cowan v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:56 am
Chris Winkelman is general counsel to the National Republican Congressional Committee, which filed an amicus brief in support of the state appellants in Gill v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:54 am
But I think the relatively little-noticed decision in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
The fourth amendment of the United States Constitution, and art. 2 § 30 of the Okla. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
In other words, an identical act of infringement would yield two different damages awards simply because the infringers packaged their products in different units. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 2:05 pm
Following the statutory requirement to establish a “legitimate busiess interest” to enforce a non-compete agreement, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Autonation, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
In 1983, the American Bar Association adopted the ABA Model Rules that are the basis for most of the current codes of conduct in the United States. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:02 am
Smith of the United States Court of Federal Claims as the moderator. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:02 am
Smith of the United States Court of Federal Claims as the moderator. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
The idea was proposed to Span, which agreed on the understanding that the $300,000 would be paid back, the preferred units would be converted to common units, and Span would end up with a 10% ownership interest in Triumph. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:23 am
In a recent case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, the court held that the following combined to make a non-compete agreement enforceable: 1. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:23 am
Ray Mart Inc. v. [read post]
