Search for: "SELLERS v. SELLERS"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 5,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2011, 3:00 am
App. 1997) (seller of real estate has duty to disclose “material facts affecting the property’s value known to the seller but no reasonably known to or discoverable by the buyer”). [read post]
13 May 2013, 12:00 am
Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:48 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:20 pm
In MGM v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:49 am
The LMA terms do not provide the seller with the ability to determine the vesting of any right to payment which might later accrue. [read post]
1 May 2019, 6:31 am
See, e.g., Anthony v. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 4:21 pm
Brod & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 9:00 am
And Ors. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 7:31 am
In CreAgri, inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 9:52 am
Comer Today's brief is of Barnwell v. [read post]
On Delfi v Estonia… Is it time to adopt a good-Samaritan style exemption? – Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
23 Jun 2015, 4:56 pm
It should be born in mind that in L’Oréal v eBay the CJEU stated 3 things: “The fact that the service provided by the operator of an online marketplace includes the storage of information transmitted to it by its customer-sellers is not in itself a sufficient ground for concluding that that service falls, in all situations, within the scope of Article 14(1) of Directive 2000/31” (at [113]). [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 7:13 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:28 pm
” The change was made to ensure that if “The seller agrees to a buyer’s offer that includes Rider V, the seller is now aware that the buyer’s offer is contingent on the buyer selling another property. [read post]
5 Sep 2021, 3:49 pm
In Chichak v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:42 pm
Institutional banks and lenders often cite GMAC v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 11:57 am
Supreme Court’s majority opinion in the South Dakota v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 9:01 am
Novation Ventures, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
Redbubble and others]….just because a seller is an online service does not mean they automatically escape liability…. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 11:10 am
”Turning to the review of “independent duties,” the Court rejected a request to extend the independent duty between a contractor-seller and a home purchaser to a similar duty between a contractor-seller and the Association. [read post]
