Search for: "State v. King"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 5,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2012, 4:42 am
Coverage of the upcoming Term continues to focus on Fisher v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 4:03 pm
The Washington State Supreme Court ruled en banc yesterday in Dean v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 4:53 am
In The New England Journal of Medicine, Nicholas Bagley, David Jones, and Timothy Jost discuss the possible impact of a decision in favor of the challengers in King v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:11 am
"Where evidentiary material is submitted on a CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion, it may be considered by the court, but unless the defendant demonstrates, without significant dispute, that a material fact alleged by the complaint is not a fact at all, the motion will not be granted" (Quesada v Global Land, Inc., 35 AD3d 575, 576; see Caravousanos v Kings County Hosp., 74 AD3d 716). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:49 am
"Where evidentiary material is submitted on a CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion, it may be considered by the court, but unless the defendant demonstrates, without significant dispute, that a material fact alleged by the complaint is not a fact at all, the motion will not be granted" (Quesada v Global Land, Inc., 35 AD3d 575, 576; see Caravousanos v Kings County Hosp., 74 AD3d 716). [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:07 pm
Accordingly, the criminal court vacates the defendant's plea of guilty and remits the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings, including a hearing to determine whether an independent source exists to support an in-court identification of the defendant by the complainant akin to People v Gethers, People v Dodt, People v Sanchez and People v Dawkins. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
King Construction Co. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 12:26 am
The Supreme Court had their first occasion to consider the interplay of these two provisions in the Quality King Distributors, Inc v L'Anza Research International, Inc. (1998). [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:11 am
The Court noted that the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit considered the question in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:02 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
12 May 2014, 8:00 am
In State v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:38 pm
But in Cardno ChemRisk v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
King, supra. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:15 pm
In the case of Murray v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:10 am
King v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 8:49 am
Heiting v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 3:34 am
In Quijano v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm
MJJG Restaurant, LLC v Horry County, 102 F. [read post]
