Search for: "State v. Murphy " Results 1641 - 1660 of 2,307
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2011, 10:18 pm
When making our Fourth Amendment inquiry, we must consider whether there is a “ clear indication’ that the intrusion will supply substantial probative evidence” (Matter of Abe A., 56 NY2d at 297, quoting Schmerber v California, 384 US 757, 770; see Cupp v Murphy, 412 US 291, 295). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:36 pm by Matt C. Bailey
Before Real Party was able to complete a response to this issue, Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye interrupted, inquiring as to the impact of the Court’s previous decision in Industrial Welfare Com. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:16 pm
Murphy Jr.Held: The Maryland Home Improvement Law does not render a contract between a home improvement general contractor and an unlicensed subcontractor unenforceable. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:41 am by Record on Appeal
Leonard from a SDO in the criminal case State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 12:59 pm by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
Constitution.With his appeals exhausted in the state courts, Cooper filed a petition for Habeas Corpus in federal court. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:27 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Constitution.With his appeals exhausted in the state courts, Cooper filed a petition for Habeas Corpus in federal court. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:27 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Constitution.With his appeals exhausted in the state courts, Cooper filed a petition for Habeas Corpus in federal court. [read blog]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am by Marie Louise
– practical ramifications of ECJ’s decision in MPS v Murphy and FAPL v QC Leisure (1709 Copyright Blog) Levies for private copying when blank media are imported: who pays? [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
This includes coverage of the law school's recent seminar, chaired by Sir Robin Jacob, on the controversial ECJ rulings in FA Premier League v QC Leisure and Murphy v Media Protection Services (noted by the IPKat here). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:18 am
Murphy, on the other hand, contended that he was eligible for appointment as a detective pursuant to the Code, citing Ryff v Safir, 264 AD2d 349, as authority for this claim. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 9:12 am by Steve Hall
"We agree with the state that the prisoners can do no more than speculate on this point," Murphy wrote. [read post]