Search for: "White v. People"
Results 1641 - 1660
of 6,148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2011, 5:25 am
People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2008, 6:01 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in U.S. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:55 pm
Roe v Wade? [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:27 am
These traits are not negative in most men, certainly not white men.Some lawyers, however, perceive Sotomayor's "toughness" as a positive judicial quality: Lawyers said Sotomayor is very active and well-prepared at oral argument. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Waters v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 7:40 pm
Then, by 1976 the Court in Gregg v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
I have to wonder if the scenario would have played out the same way with two white students in a car in Harvard Square. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:20 pm
Sixty years later, the Court's unanimous 1956 Brown v Board of Education decision held that separate schools for white and black children were unconstitutional because they were "inherently unequal. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 2:54 am
New Hampshire, the first the court will take a "hard look" at the issue since Manson v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:46 pm
White. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 3:55 am
The white owner of an Atlanta motel, Mr. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:47 am
And indeed the noted Murthy v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 4:56 pm
Supreme Court explained in Riley v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:44 pm
Lovell v. [read post]
23 Mar 2006, 1:13 pm
• 4 flowers in each box (flowers weren't always in the same pattern)• 100 total flowers in red boxes• 84 little white boxes on ceiling• 40 long white flowers in 20 blue boxes on ceiling• Blue squares w/ flowers in each of 4 corners• 6 lights in blue boxes on ceiling• 30 little blue boxes with white flowers (not counting corners or lights) in… [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:33 am
And as a legal matter, Brown v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:47 am
Heller and McDonald v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
In the first case, Frank v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
