Search for: "HUGHES v. STATE"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 1,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2018, 3:15 am
Blobel was a longtime professor at Rockefeller University, head of its Laboratory of Cell Biology, and was also employed by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI). [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Categories of Unprotected Speech The Minnesota law at issue in State of Minnesota v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:32 pm
Finkelstein, Basic Concepts of Probability and Statistics in the Law 86-87 (2009) (criticizing the blatantly incorrect interpretation of confidence intervals by the Brock court). 2 Zach Hughes, “The Legal Significance of Statistical Significance,” 28 Westlaw Journal: Pharmaceutical 1, 2 (Mar. 2012). 3 See Norman E. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:46 am
The personality and experience of individual justices, hinted at in portraits of Justice Sutherland or references to international roles played by Jay, Marshall, Taft, Hughes, and Jackson, recede into the background. [read post]
19 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
” The Fifth Circuit ruling (O’Donnell v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
In addition to this, all state public defender cases are included. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:51 pm
The significance of the case is that it no longer appears to be an implied duty under the orders, but an express duty.Some historyThe leading case prior to this was in Stevenson v Hughes(1993), a case in which the child did not go to see his father or speak on the phone. [read post]
22 May 2017, 10:01 pm
Were he still alive, Manfred would enjoy seeing Elk Point, SD, with less than 2,000 residents, become the stage for Siouxland’s “trial of the century,” with BPI v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 1:12 pm
v=4TPuttz2wes Is lifetime sinecure a bad thing? [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 3:00 pm
In Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 5:19 am
As for the injunction request, though it has yet to be properly examined in court, Judge Hugh R. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
An Iowa high court opinion, State v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:27 am
In the wake of the UK Supreme Court decision in Warner-Lambert v Actavis (IPKat post here), second medical use claims have received considerable attention from the IP commentariat. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 8:52 am
Second, it would appear doubtful that a paywall is strictly speaking a TPM, as stated at paragraph 31. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:39 am
These include information on the applicant's race, religion, national origin, age, pregnancy status, marital status, disability, sexual orientation (some state and local jurisdictions), gender expression or identity (some state and local jurisdictions) and genetic information. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 3:42 pm
EPA and Biden v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Maryland and United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Supreme Court, and agreed that the FTC had made out a prima facie case under the burden-shifting framework commonly attributed to Baker Hughes. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm
Move Press, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
