Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 4,276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2008, 11:43 am
Supreme Court decision in Davis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 9:08 pm
Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137, 177 (1803), and the Executive’s constitutional duty “to preserve the national security,” United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:57 am
Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment, arguing that the tenant is a British citizen who entered the United States on a B-2 tourist visa, and is thus statutorily barred from maintaining a permanent residence in the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:46 am
See, e.g., Holder v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Perez, et al., No. 17-586 (Supreme Court of the United States, decided June 25, 2018). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Perez, et al., No. 17-586 (Supreme Court of the United States, decided June 25, 2018). [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 12:30 pm
Gordon immigrated from Jamaica to the United States as a green card holder in 1982 when he was six years old, and he's lived here ever since. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 11:28 am
" Wisconsin v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 7:26 am
Previously Posted: On October 27, 2010 the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals in Hurtado v Holder, affirmed the trial court's denial of habeas relief. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 11:34 am
If you’re an immigrant or visa-holder in the United States and believe you’ve been affected by this social media monitoring, the ACLU wants to hear your story. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
The revised EO applies only to noncitizen visa applicants with no previous ties to the United States—a group with scant, if any, statutory or constitutional rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:43 am
Thank you.Declaration of Copyright Self-Regulation of the Chinese Internet SectorIn order to safeguard copyright and related right holders' lawful rights and interest, stimulate the healthy development of the Internet industry, safeguard social and public interests, the representatives of the Internet sector make the following declaration of self-regulation to society:I, Internet enterprises shall undertake their obligations to society, earnestly respect and propagate State… [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
See Brief for Petitioners 27, Reply Brief 16; Brief for Respondents 43; see also Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 12–13.Teva Pharma. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:50 am
For JDPI or similarly situated trademark holders to obtain a different outcome, they must seek relief before the United States Supreme Court or the United States Congress. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:31 am
And suddenly a foreign patent holder, in, say, Switzerland, has — takes this American company and obtains enormous profits on the basis of the sales in the United States, where those sales do not violate American law. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:26 am
United States (7-2 per Roberts). [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
Paul McCauley, D2004-0014 (WIPO April 22, 2004) in which the Panel noted that the “Policy is designed to prevent abusive cybersquatting, but under United States law, it cannot extend to insulating trademark holders from contrary and critical views when such views are legitimately expressed without an intention for commercial gain. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
For the most part these trade disputes have been with the United States before NAFTA and Canada-U.S. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
The beginning of the en banc opinion reads:Congress has declared: “Except as otherwise providedin [the Patent Act], whoever without authority makes,uses, offers to sell, or sells any patented invention, withinthe United States or imports into the United States anypatented invention during the term of the patent therefor,infringes the patent. [read post]
