Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 3,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2008, 10:01 pm
Spain kept not only Texas, but western territories that today comprise much of the states of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming.... 1774, in London, England, at the conclusion of 2-1/2 weeks of proceedings in the case captioned Donaldson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
Lord Sumption JSC explaining at [19] that, the rule originated in the division between the functions of judge and jury, the question of libel or no libel being exclusively for the jury. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:16 am
They reiterate largely what has been stated to be his position to the Scottish parliament. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:39 am
The full list of links can be found here. 18 June | FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department: New immigration and asylum judgment from the Administrative Court; new problems for the Government with implementation of a European Directive 17 June | Government shelves Equality Act timetable: From Out-law.com 17 June | Control orders: a balancing act between human rights and national security: Joshua Rozenberg comments on two recent Supreme Court judgments 17 June |… [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 3:13 am
Lord Briggs dissented. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:36 am
The case was referred to the ECJ by the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court) in 2008 (M, R (on the application of) v Her Majesty’s Treasury [2008] UKHL 26). [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:17 am
Ignatius Yordan Nugraha, Strasbourg Observers: Consolidating the legal recognition and protection of same-sex couples: Koilova and Babulkova v Bulgaria. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
The source stated that the police officer “could be” the claimant and that he had reported this to the police. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but only… [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
In his report concerning 2004 Lord Carlile stated that his views on the use of the power had ‘developed’ (Carlile Report on 2004, para 25) and that ‘their use gave some rise for anxiety’ (para 96). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:46 pm
[FN35] Lord Wilberforce stated unequivocally that "infringement of copyright is not theft. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm
Mylius was convicted after a one-day trial before the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Alverstone, and a special jury at the High Court. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:10 pm
Much reliance was placed by Actavis' counsel on the Court of Appeal in Actavis v Merck [2008] EWCA Civ 444 which stated that:“32. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 This is not a housing case, but it is an important case on costs in settled claims for judicial review, which is a major issue for many housing practitioners. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 This is not a housing case, but it is an important case on costs in settled claims for judicial review, which is a major issue for many housing practitioners. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 11:55 am
” For a more recent affirmation of the principle, see R(Binyam Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 65, paras 38-42, per Lord Judge CJ. 20. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:19 am
Indeed, in paragraph 7 of the judgment, Lord Briggs and Lord Sales set out that so-called juridical taxation is a “fact of life”, given that each member state has sovereign authority over its own tax affairs. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Willson v. [read post]
