Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
She was given permanent accommodation before the Supreme Court hearing, but Lord Hope stated that, if there had been a live issue it would “have been preferable for her to be given an opportunity for the proportionality of the order to be considered in the light of her personal circumstances”. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
She was given permanent accommodation before the Supreme Court hearing, but Lord Hope stated that, if there had been a live issue it would “have been preferable for her to be given an opportunity for the proportionality of the order to be considered in the light of her personal circumstances”. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
In January, Lord Justice Warby had delivered summary judgment in her favour, setting aside for later only the copyright point of the possible second author of the letter. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:51 am
United States, 156 U.S. 432; 15 S. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 7:53 am
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC & Ors) v SSHD, heard 13 May 2014. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 1:00 am
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:46 am
Four years later, however, the Lords revisited the principles established by Fairchild in the case of Barker v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
"Clear enough.But then the Supreme Court held in Thermtron Prods., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:05 am
The judgment In R (Williamson) v Secretary of State [2005] UKHL 15, Lord Nicholls had drawn a distinction at [16] between the two elements of Article 9: there was “a difference between freedom to hold a belief and freedom to express or ‘manifest’ a belief. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
On 28 February 2020 the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Burnett, gave his annual press conference. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 8:52 am
Grimm in the case of Lorraine v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:17 am
It is the binding force of the House of Lords’ decisions which produce that result. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 5:22 am
In Servedio v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 3:19 pm
The case also marks the debut of Harry Potter citations in the House of Lords. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
This was confirmed by the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457. [read post]
23 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
” Forrester v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am
The Convention is a constitutional instrument of European public order (see Loizidou v. [read post]
