Search for: "Word v. U. S"
Results 1661 - 1680
of 2,169
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2014, 8:09 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:54 am
Daubert, 113 S Ct at 2797. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:18 pm
Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 236 U. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Decision 14,373Sometimes it may be difficult to determine the location of that thin line that separates lawful constructive criticism of an individual’s performance by a supervisor and supervisory actions addressing an individual’s performance that are disciplinary in nature.As the Court of Appeals indicated in Holt v Webutick Central School District, 52 NY2d 625, a counseling memorandum that is given to an employee and placed in his or her personnel file… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:34 am
U bald piece of shit die mother fucker. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
§ 1182(d)(5).3 Biden v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
This is a matter of the applicant’s choice. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 10:30 pm
Las penas se simplifican a tres: multas, inhabilitación y prisión (sobre esto volveremos más adelante). [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 12:10 pm
v=ZtgOcBHqTqk Ni como esclavos sirven. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
….[22] Although the Consortium argued that this finding was based on the weight given to the evidence by the Board, a matter with which this Court should not lightly intervene, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the Board, through oversight, overlooked the expert evidence and submissions it accepted as exhibits AC-114 and AC-114A on December 5, 2014. [23] The Board’s clear wording that Access provided no evidence rebuts the presumption that a… [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
….[22] Although the Consortium argued that this finding was based on the weight given to the evidence by the Board, a matter with which this Court should not lightly intervene, it is difficult to conclude anything other than that the Board, through oversight, overlooked the expert evidence and submissions it accepted as exhibits AC-114 and AC-114A on December 5, 2014. [23] The Board’s clear wording that Access provided no evidence rebuts the presumption that a… [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 9:09 pm
Takushi (1992) and Anderson v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 7:18 am
Nystrom v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:58 am
’ Hall, 440 U. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
Louis U. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:29 pm
"The words are IMPROVE the opportunity, not create the opportunity. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:19 pm
("This Act continues the effect of the relation back doctrine, not by using the specific words, but by directly stating what the relation back doctrine has been interpreted to mean. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
U-Haul Co., 613 F. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Finally, a heavy hammer slams down on the “failures of the Supreme Court to fulfill its duty to (in John Marshall’s words) ‘say what the law is. [read post]
