Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 1681 - 1700
of 2,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
The updated rules, however, permit schools to share student data with companies to which they have outsourced core functions like scheduling, data management, or test analysis. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 6:36 am
As I explained earlier, the crux of plaintiffs’ RFRA claims in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood is that the HHS “Preventive Services” Rule substantially burdens the religious exercise of the companies’ owners and managers by putting them to an untenable choice between their civil and religious obligations. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
By an amendment to CPR 26.11 the right to jury trial in claims for libel and slander is removed. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
This amendment eliminates a big barrier of high copayments. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:28 am
The managing member opposed the motion, contending that the night club was operating at a loss and needed additional capital to fund operating expenses. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 7:38 pm
Although the court did not go so far as to rule that secular, for-profit corporations have a right to free exercise of religion, it did find that the connection between the Gilardis’ payment for health insurance coverage and the use of the premiums to cover contraceptive services was direct enough to infringe on their individual rights under RFRA and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 6:00 am
In 2004, the Appeal Court ruled in the province's favour, finding that EI should only be used to replace wages of those who have lost their jobs, not to fund social programs. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 8:15 am
Some people use Citizens United as shorthand for the proposition that corporations have First Amendment rights, but of course the Court has been treating corporations as having First Amendment rights for many decades. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:15 pm
Excerpt from amended pleading filed by Texas AG against Midland Funding LLC et al over robosigningThe AG's lawsuit resulted in an Agreed Final Judgment and Assurance of Voluntary Compliance half a year later after several rounds of amended pleadings. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 4:08 am
For another, it resonated with a recent Delaware Chancery Court decision in a dissenting shareholder case called Huff Fund Investment Partnership v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:56 pm
Applying this rule and the test announced by the Supreme Court in Save Tara v. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 1:45 pm
I’m also left wondering how the trial court “erred” when the rule construed by the Court is based on out-of-state case law. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 12:26 am
Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, the case was remanded back to the lower courts and in in June the Fifth Circuit certified a class in the case. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 3:39 am
The lower court denied Jonathan’s multi-faceted motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 5:30 am
Court, D. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 9:34 am
Supreme Court of Florida.Res judicata -- District court properly dismissed antitrust counterclaim in instant case where claim raised was identical to claim raised and litigated in another antitrust lawsuit between the same parties, and circuit court affirmed dismissal of that complaint -- Appellees' request for award of fees and costs under rule 38 deniedAKANTHOS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, CNH CA MASTER ACCOUNT, L.P., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 12:12 am
Beyond the anti-circumvention provisions mentioned above, the leaked draft also contains restrictions on importation that were rejected by the Supreme Court this year in Wiley v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:35 pm
CHRISTOPHER STAPLES, Respondent. 1st District.Attorney's fees -- Appellate -- Trial court did not abuse discretion in using a fee multiplier of 1.5 in awarding appellate attorney's fees where the court had determined that a multiplier of 1.5 was appropriate in awarding trial court attorney's fees -- Claim that prevailing party attorney's fees provision in sections 175.061(5) and 185.05(5), Florida Statutes did not apply to a local government pension fund… [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 10:47 am
As amended, the new rule would apply to private funds making general solicitations under Rule 506(c). [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am
Specifically, the question before the Court is: “Whether a state violates the Equal Protection Clause by amending its constitution to prohibit race and sex-based discrimination or preferential treatment in public-university admissions decisions. [read post]
