Search for: "Laws v. State" Results 1681 - 1700 of 155,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2019, 1:14 pm by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
The Appellate Division recently held that in enacting the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD), the Legislature intended the Act to be construed as broad enough to extend to certain nonresidents who sought employment in the State. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am by INFORRM
In the increasingly heated debate about the state of English privacy law, the courts have frequently been accused of seeking to introduce a privacy law “by the backdoor”. [read post]
1 May 2024, 12:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Thom Brooks (Durham University - Law School; Yale Law School) has posted The Relevance of State Misconduct for Mitigating Individual Punishment (In Julian V. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 7:44 am
Opinion by Judge Irma Raker.From the headnotes by the court:"CRIMINAL LAW - PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS - DISCOVERY VIOLATIONS -SANCTIONS: Under Maryland Rule 4-263, the trial court possesses discretion to impose appropriate sanctions for discovery violations; the proper focus and inquiry in determining the proper sanctions is whether the petitioner was prejudiced, and if so, whether he was entitled to have the evidence excluded.CRIMINAL LAW - PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS - DISCOVERY… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:03 am by Bridget Crawford
United States: Blog Resource and Film AnnouncementFilmmakers April Hayes and Katia Maguire are in the process of producing Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:46 am by Erik C. Fritz
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held that the Bankruptcy Code does not preempt state law claims brought by non-debtors for damages related to the filing of an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:00 am by Steve Clowney
Department of Agriculture: Expanding Per Se Takings While Endorsing State Sovereign Ownership of Wildlife (Maryland Law Review) on SSRN. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]