Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 1681 - 1700 of 4,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
As reported on the Hunton Employment Labor and Law Blog, on January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:22 pm by Leland E. Beck
Northwest Environmental Defense Center, argued this morning in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 7:38 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Amicus brief of Law Professors Amicus brief of New Jersey Public Advocate Amicus brief of the United States (grant) Supplemental brief of respondents No. 09-475, Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Bennett, et al., seeks to rely in part on the Supreme Court’s controversial ruling in January in Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
Sri Srinivasan, arguing on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae, maintained that the case involved conflict preemption only, pointing out that other state laws, such as those dealing with corporate governance, would still apply, a point that both Justices Kennedy and Ginsburg also appeared to make during questioning of Mr. [read post]
By contrast, the work of a city council or board, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices considered the scope of tribal fishing rights, comes from Miriam Seifter. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 5:15 am by David Markus
Two, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Anthony Kennedy, found that the formula for identifying states requiring federal oversight no longer was constitutional. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
United States, Sarah Friedman on  Hansberry v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 8:01 am
Ainsa, Jr. of El Paso, Texas, arguing for petitioner, began by appealing to the Court's prior decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 11:26 am by John Elwood
United States, 09–1555, and Beer v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:53 am by Erin Miller
United States, and Weyhrauch v. [read post]