Search for: "United States v. Kennedy" Results 1681 - 1700 of 4,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm by LindaMBeale
  Writing for the Court and joined by Justices Kagan, Sotomayor, Breyer, and Ginsburg, Justice Kennedy recognized that states have historically been allowed to define marriage--subject to Congressional restraints as in Loving v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 9:21 am by James Beck - Guest
  In Geier, but not in Williamson, the United States government had supported preemption on the ground that allowing the state-law claims would conflict with agency objectives. [read post]
27 May 2014, 1:59 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  This statement is unworthy of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm by Kate Mancuso
Robbins and Bowles v. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 1:58 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a ruling allowing for the admissibility of evidence, even if said evidence was improperly seized. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am by John E. Harding, JD, CFLS
Abbott could demonstrate that returning to Chile would put her own safety at risk, the court could consider whether this is sufficient to show that the child too would suffer 'psychological harm' or be placed in an intolerable situation," Kennedy said.Lower courts can also take into account the child's wishes if he is mature enough to express them, Kennedy said.The case is Abbott v. [read post]
  Under the Clean Water Act, these agencies have dual regulatory authority to protect “waters of the United States” and “adjacent wetlands. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 4:03 am by Michael Boyd
Panetta was a lawsuit filed in 2012 challenging the targeted drone killings by the United States of three U.S. citizens in Yemen. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 6:47 am by Jay Willis
” Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood speculates on who may be writing the four opinions remaining from the October sitting; among his predictions is that either Justice Kennedy or Justice Stevens will write the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
"Since the Constitution of the United States says nothing about this subject, it is left to be resolved by normal democratic means, including the democratic adoption of provisions in state constitutions," Scalia said. [read post]