Search for: "Cooper v. United States"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 3,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2019, 10:17 am
Youville Hospital v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 4:59 am
Today is the 97th anniversary of the 19th amendment to the United States Constitution guaranteeing women the right to vote. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
The Court noted, “Contrary to Armstrong’s apparent belief, pleadings filed in the United States District Courts are not press releases, internet blogs, or pieces of investigative journalism. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:42 am
In Birchfield v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 1:57 pm
Garland and Firebaugh v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 2:42 pm
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling this morning in Case C‑572/13, Hewlett-Packard Belgium SPRL v Reprobel SCRL, intervener Epson Europe BV, a request for a preliminary ruling under from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Court of Appeal, Brussels, Belgium). [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:57 am
Docket: 08-853 Title: Zessar v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:02 am
Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
United States, a case about the harmless error standard. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:38 am
United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
For example, if, in a layoff situation, the clerk having greater seniority than a co-worker employed as a clerk in the same layoff unit is excessed, the typical redress awarded to the individual incorrectly laid off is reinstatement to his or her former position with full back salary and benefits. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In the U.S., the report highlights the recent Supreme Court of the United States decision, West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:02 am
But lawmakers cannot expect other countries to comply with their treaty obligations to us unless the United States observes its treaty obligations to them. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
. to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 2:56 pm
(“Dick”) Schmidt, was General Counsel for the United States Information Agency (USIA). [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 11:16 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/02/02/10-10009.pdf United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:58 pm
A leading relevant case, Gerber v Keyes, was decided by a Florida appellate court and New York State ruled in a similar fashion in Wegman v Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. [read post]
