Search for: "Legal Writing Prof"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 1,960
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2016, 5:18 am
It wasn’t the sort of outcome that lent itself to being generous toward the legal system. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:36 pm
(H/T to Prof. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:44 am
Kudos to the NLRB (words I may never again write).To paraphrase the Workplace Prof Blog: The report isn’t particularly groundbreaking, and it’s nice to see the government shed some light on — and simply summarize — the various cases in the area. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
At the Pacific Legal Foundation’s blog, Timothy Snowball weighs in on Gundy v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 11:30 pm
The reason for it this time is some new information, courtesy of Don Clarke at the Chinese Law Prof Blog, on the deal that the U.S. and China struck to end this dispute. [read post]
11 Sep 2006, 11:29 pm
Many have latched onto this silence to claim that pretexting is legal. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:22 pm
Among other things, I cited the work of Prof. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
To figure out what is really happening in Texas, I spoke with a couple well-connected attorneys in Texas (one of whom frequently writes about legal matters, and had taken a close look at these proceedings). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 9:51 am
In other words, a government censorship board could legally penalize a major Internet service for exhibiting any sort of political bias. [read post]
7 May 2015, 4:02 pm
Prof. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 4:54 am
On June 12, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in David Ayers v. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 12:01 am
He writes: Tony Mauro, who watches the Supreme Court with a legal-eagle eye for Legal Times, noted that Justice Stephen Breyer has his own pronunciation. [read post]
2 Apr 2016, 3:09 am
Once again: New followers: I tweet about books, writing, racial justice, intersectional feminism, mental health, academia, & sports—Welcome! [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In 1954, Rome ordered him to stop writing about church and state. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:41 am
One can understand why Prof. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:43 am
But Randazza isn't some legal research and writing cog, the typical throwaway post, but teaches real courses. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:30 am
In my remarks, I borrowed some valuable slides from Prof. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
There is one sentence in his interesting paper that deserves special scrutiny in this regard: He writes that I believe that “the immigration of large numbers of Haredim into Israel may not turn out to be an unmixed blessing. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:08 pm
& Prof. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Commentary comes from David Alan Sklansky at Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog. [read post]