Search for: "People v. Andrews" Results 1701 - 1720 of 1,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
  The government’s cover letter explains that it is going forward with the proposal despite yesterday’s decision in the Microsoft case in the Second Circuit (discussed by Andrew Woods here), but lays down a pretty clear marker that it will be addressing that decision soon. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 5:00 am by Neil Siegel
., the President’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and at least five other people, including a lawyer connected to the Russian government who promised “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 2:17 pm by Patricia Hughes
[See CTV News Story here and decision in Working Families Coalition (Canada) Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:00 am by Michael Grossman
Andrew Wakefield’s 1998 study relating vaccination to autism as the time when anti-vax crossed the rubicon, there has been an ebb and flow of anti-vaccine sentiment since the early 20th century. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:24 am by Andres
Andrew Murray, who has written about the case here. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
      Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
Over at Foreign Policy, Jeffrey Mankoff and Andrew Bowen discuss the projection of Russian power in the Syria in an attempt to “guarantee its own long term future in the Middle East. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 1:58 pm by Elina Saxena
They add that "a search for belonging, purpose, adventure, and friendship, appear to remain the main reasons for people to join the Islamic State. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
For the defense, Richard Kammen kicks things off by addressing his wardrobe for the occasion: “As the court knows, my luggage somehow did not get on the plane at Andrews … I apologize I have no tie. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 9:00 am by Masha Simonova
Given the text of the two laws in question, it is worth asking why people seem so unafraid of vulnerability under them, even in flouting their apparent terms so openly. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Louie Gohmert and Andrew Clyde appear to be the first members punished under the rule, which says lawmakers who by [read post]
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm by David Walk
They simply count up how many of the 26 people said various things. [read post]