Search for: "People v. White"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 7,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Oct 2022, 4:36 am
The court validated affirmative action in a foundational decision, Grutter v. [read post]
3 Sep 2024, 6:30 am
United States and Katzenbach v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:46 am
(Eugene Volokh) Dariano v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
” The facts of Irvin v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm
Rubenstein analyzed the implications of the Texas v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Nixon refused to turn over the tapes made in the Oval Office, lost in the US Supreme Court in US v. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 9:38 pm
Cute if unkind, but it's worth reflecting on when we consider Mandela v., oh well, almost anybody else in Africa. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:00 pm
Almost every potential juror was white. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
Such a move would require White House approval. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:14 pm
Near the end of the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
Filburn (1942) and United States v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 5:10 am
While the officers were there, they did a "security sweep" and kept people separate. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:53 pm
People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 12:36 pm
Rich people are more likely to acquire IP rights than poor people; whites than minorities in the US; males than females. [read post]
10 May 2022, 7:30 am
This mass practice of adoption for white people at the dawn of the Civil Rights era constituted a feature of “making race” in the U.S.: re-enforcing racial difference and white supremacy. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
Of course corporations have some rights, but they do not have the same rights as actual people. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:36 am
” (People ex rel. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:03 pm
Additional Resources: Kengerski v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 8:02 am
This makes emails more easily accessible, reducing a person’s “reasonable expectation” of privacy. (3) In a 2001 New Jersey case, White v White, the court cited this lack of “reasonable expectation” of privacy when it denied a motion to suppress emails. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 12:10 pm
Bell v. [read post]
