Search for: "STONE v. CASE" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 1:01 am by war
The fact that ‘Alligator’ was a fancy word used only by the plaintiff was a vital consideration in JB Stone & Co Ltd v Steelace Manufacturing Co Ltd (1929) 46 RPC 406, a case which Kitto J did read narrowly. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
Canada On 12 April 2023, judgement was handed down in the case of Alberta Health Services and Sarah Nunn v Johnston, 2023 ABKB 209. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Peter S. Margulies
A similar dynamic has occurred following the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 11:47 am by rhapsodyinbooks
When the case first came before the Court, three justices (all southerners), including Chief Justice Fred Vinson, believed that the old “separate but equal” doctrine enunciated in Plessy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 8:46 am
Do you know why some Bankruptcy Judges hate it when they have a pro per debtor in a case before them? [read post]
11 May 2018, 2:40 pm by Eugene Volokh
An interesting case about libel and science; I will quote from the magistrate's report and recommendations in Santilli v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 4:23 am
Following the recent CJEU decisions in Case C-617/15(Hummel v Nike, reported in various places including here) and joined Cases C-24/16 and C-25/16 (Nintendo v BigBen Interactive, reported on this very blawg), the English court’s decision in Poul Chang Metal Industry Company Ltd v Bailcast Ltd and Anor [2018] EWHC 3432 (Ch) has just become available. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 8:24 pm by William W. Abbott
This case concludes that these standards may not be cast in stone but have to be read an applied in conjunction with other relevant general plan policies. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Amy Howe
” Last week’s decision in Luis v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 2:20 pm
  In each case, the court's focus on the gross negligence versus bad faith distinction hearkens back to the Delaware Supreme Court's statement in Stone v. [read post]