Search for: "State v. T. R. O." Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,894
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O)   US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago IP Litigation… [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Relies on member states; referrals go through national authorities. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 2:12 am by gmlevine
“[I]t does not appear that [Complainant’s] mark is used outside the United States (aside from the fact that Internet users worldwide presumably can view Complainant’s website). [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:00 am
" California Labor Code section 226.7, subdivision (a), for example, states that "[N]o employer shall require any employee to work during any meal or rest period. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
(IPEG)   Denmark Revamp of Danish PTO English language site – invitation for help from users (Class 46)   Europe ECJ gives Copad ruling on exhaustion and luxury goods; interpretation of Article 8(2) leads to new questions: Copad SA v Christian Dior couture SA, Vincent Gladel, as liquidator of Société industrielle lingerie (Class 46) (IPKat) Anti-patent rally; criticism of practice of patenting biological processes - Munich… [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 8:36 am by Lisa Whittaker
Wallace apologized and stated she would try to be at work at or before 9 o’clock. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:03 am by Florian Mueller
However, as the great Rush Limbaugh noted then, Obama presumably wouldn't have gone to Delaware to campaign for Coons if Republican candidate Christine O'Donnell hadn't had a prayer. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  This is a question that, as the Supreme Court confirmed in 2010 (in R v Chaytor), and as the High Court reminded us as recently as 15 June 2018, is an appropriate question for the court to determine. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:56 pm
The applicant must be in one of the following categories at time of enlistment a. asylee, refugee, Temporary Protected Status (TPS), or b. nonimmigrant categories E, F, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, TC, TD, TN, U, or V 2. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am by Jonathan Bailey
On copyright, this most prominently includes the case Golan v. [read post]