Search for: "State v. Words"
Results 1701 - 1720
of 36,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2008, 10:57 am
The Supreme Court has ruled on Riegel v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 2:16 am
The Supreme Court held that a narrow and technical approach to the words ‘social support’ in descriptor 9c is unwarranted as it is inconsistent with the Government’s objective of creating a benefit which is easier to understand and enabling those who need extra support to live independently. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 10:13 am
In other words, the Court is going to define what is meant by the word pimp. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
AT&T Corp. (1998) 63 Cal.App.4th 325, 332; see State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 2:30 am
He discusses the application of De Keyser principles and the controls imposed by Parliament on prerogative powers to ratify international treaties. 13.05: The hearing has adjourned for lunch and is expected to resume at 14:00. 12.58: The next case referred to is R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex parte Rees-Mogg: James Eadie QC submits that the availability of the prerogative in relation to EU law depends on… [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 11:10 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:02 am
But wherever he went, the words went with him. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:01 am
The full court opinion: State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:00 pm
"Said Justice Elena Kagan in today's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
Dangerous Decision in Oracle v. Google: Federal Circuit Reverses Sensible Lower Court Ruling on APIs
9 May 2014, 12:25 pm
We're still digesting today's lengthy decision in the Oracle v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:28 am
Post by: Craig Robson The reasons and result in the recent case of Demetriou v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 10:20 am
Background: On May 2, 2014, the Federal Court of Appeal released its long-awaited decision in the case of Johnstone v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:33 pm
In 1992, Quill v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
Liggett Co. v. [read post]
10 May 2017, 5:30 am
CPLR Article 86, the Equal Access to Justice Act, applies in cases brought against the State for alleged unlawful discrimination within the meaning of the Human Rights LawKimmel v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 03689, Court of AppealsUnder the Equal Access to Justice Act [EAJA; CPLR Article 86] under certain circumstances a court may award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs to a prevailing plaintiff in a suit against the State. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
There was, in my view, no allegation of scandal beyond the stated facts. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:52 am
" The case, Arizona v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 7:20 am
In Bone v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:51 am
EPA v. [read post]
