Search for: "USA v. Grant" Results 1701 - 1720 of 2,901
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2013, 8:30 am by Conor McEvily
At Talking Points Memo, Sahil Kapur discusses retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s recently expressed doubts on whether the Court should have granted review in Bush v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am by Anna Christensen
At Reason.com, Brian Doherty discusses the Court’s recent decision to grant the NRA’s motion for divided argument in McDonald v. [read post]
21 May 2018, 3:12 pm by John T. McDonald and Cheryl Blount
In the three cases for which certiorari was granted, the Fifth Circuit rejected the Board’s position in Murphy Oil USA Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 The case is styled as Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 11:54 pm
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Cellco Partnership (doing business as Verizon Wireless) v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
” Techdirt discusses Monday’s cert. grant in Mayo Collaborative Services v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
In the Second Circuit, courts “look to the overall impression created by the logos and the context in which they are found and consider the totality of the factors” which could cause confusion, Gruner + Jahr USA Publ’g v Meredith Corp(2nd Circ. 2013). [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
AMERICAN VETERINARY NURSES ASSOCIATION Geographically Descriptive of Veterinary Services, Says TTABTTAB Test: Is The Design/Stylization of This USA SUPPLEMENTS Mark Inherently Distinctive? [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 10:13 pm
  Forum Selection Clause Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications USA, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:40 am by Amy Howe
The ImmigrationProf Blog continues its online symposium on Kerry v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions Granted with immediate Vacatur and Remand (GVR) Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 8:10 pm
Finding no merit in Peters's claims, we affirm. 08a0550n.06 USA v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 7:18 am by Ben
The  decision in the case,  Islestarr Holdings Ltd v Aldi Stores Ltd  [2019] EWHC 1473 (Ch) dismissed Aldi’s argument that the ephemerality of the powder design meant that it was not sufficiently fixed to be granted copyright protection. [read post]