Search for: "House v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 25,342
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2015, 7:45 am by Wendy
For those of you interested in which cases were chosen, the list is below: Rylands v Fletcher (1866) LR 3 HL 330Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256Salomon v A Salomon & Co [1897] AC 22Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Woolmington v Director of Public Prosecutions [1935] AC 462 Liversidge v Anderson [1942] AC 206 Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB… [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:05 am by Florian Mueller
Qualcomm this year) may even find it highly dissuasive.Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, who is presiding over the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
Curiously, the federal Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") was not spawned by Watergate, but instead was passed in 1966, eight years before Nixon left the White House for good. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 3:34 pm
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:34 pm
Yesterday, Geoffrey Stone delivered a Chicago's Best Ideas talk with the title of "Government Secrecy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
The Clearing House Ass'n, L.L.C. (08-453), holding that states have the power to police discrimination in mortgage lending. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm by David S. Cohen
  Those Justices relied on the Slaughter-House Cases, as well as the 1876 case of United States v. [read post]
Narasimha Rao v State (CBI/SPE), which granted immunity to such politicians and held that such members of the legislature enjoy immunity from being charged with bribery in relation to the way they vote or speak in the House. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The trial judge held that he was bound to follow the approach adopted by the House of Lords in the cases of Cookson v Knowles [1979] AC 556 and Graham v Dodds [1983] 1 WLR 808 and to calculate the multiplier from the date of death. [read post]