Search for: "House v. State" Results 1721 - 1740 of 25,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2007, 3:34 pm
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:34 pm
Yesterday, Geoffrey Stone delivered a Chicago's Best Ideas talk with the title of "Government Secrecy v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:40 am
The Clearing House Ass'n, L.L.C. (08-453), holding that states have the power to police discrimination in mortgage lending. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by WIMS
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:00 am
Curiously, the federal Freedom of Information Act ("FOIA") was not spawned by Watergate, but instead was passed in 1966, eight years before Nixon left the White House for good. [read post]
Narasimha Rao v State (CBI/SPE), which granted immunity to such politicians and held that such members of the legislature enjoy immunity from being charged with bribery in relation to the way they vote or speak in the House. [read post]
26 May 2022, 12:02 pm by becassidy
Ohio’s legislature is considering an abortion “trigger bill” which would immediately outlaw abortion in the state if the United States Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Fili Shipping Co., UK House of Lords). 8) In the facts, MSM stated that the Deed was voidable at its option for false representation and fraud. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 7:37 am
I previously posted here about a case in front of the United States Supreme Court that deals with how far does the rule from Georgia v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 12:42 pm by David S. Cohen
  Those Justices relied on the Slaughter-House Cases, as well as the 1876 case of United States v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 10:02 am by Eric Goldman
The fact that the White House communicated with Facebook and Twitter about the general topic does not transform into state action their decisions about one post or tweet….even if the White House had specifically communicated with these companies about Hart’s post or tweet, their enforcement of its policy as to that post or tweet would still not be joint action. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 10:21 am by Dominic Holmes and Grace Parry, Olswang
  This is a particularly difficult area of law, which is governed by the House of Lords’ decision in Lawson v Serco [2006] ICR 250. [read post]