Search for: "King v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 5,385
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2010, 12:03 am
Drawing inspiration from another landmark case (Bhatia International v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:06 am
King v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:06 am
King v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:02 am
At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner profiles Edith Windsor, the plaintiff in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 4:00 pm
In Wilson v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:31 pm
Hall, Jr. of the Eastern District sat on an appellate panel in New Orleans while I was working for him (with Judges Carolyn King and Emilio Garza) and even authored one of the panel's opinions, U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 6:36 am
Louis, Morgan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
United States, when it held: "When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'" In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am
Reers, 27 Misc 3d 195 (Sup Ct, Kings County 2010). [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 12:56 pm
King v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 8:37 am
King et al. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:28 am
Burger King Corp., 255 F. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
While Kings County Farm Bureau v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
King v State, Supreme Court No. 140684.Given the departure of Justice Davis from the Court (who was in the majority), a motion for rehearing seems likely. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 12:01 pm
King v. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 12:05 pm
King Fourth Amendment: Davis v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:53 am
I read with interest the transcript from yesterday’s oral argument in Minneci v. [read post]
3 Jan 2021, 7:18 pm
Michigan: In King v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:26 am
The Supreme Court in Quality King v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
LEXIS 71669 (SD MS, Aug. 14, 2009), a Mississippi federal magistrate judge rejected a challenge by a Rastafarian prisoner to the state's grooming policy that prevented him from wearing his hair in dreadlocks.In Carson v. [read post]
