Search for: "Matter of Arthur"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 1,972
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2020, 2:11 pm
On April 2, 2020, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal (Division 5) filed its published opinion in Coalition for an Equitable Westlake/MacArthur Park v. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 4:23 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
After years of study, Marin County adopted an Ordinance in 2011 banning single-use plastic bags and mandating a 5-cent fee on single-use paper bags; the ordinance applies to roughly 40 retailers in the unincorporated county. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
Black happened to look up and spot Arthur Burns quietly sitting by himself across the way. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:34 am
Arthur Juni was a truck and car car mechanic, who worked on the clutches, brakes, and manifold gaskets of Ford trucks. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am
However, due to the fact, there is no general principle of force majeure in English law, if a contract refers only to a “force majeure event” then it will be a matter of contractual interpretation to determine what this means in the circumstances. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 4:14 am
Even here, however, the product patent has advantages, due to the patent principle that a product patent covers a product no matter how it is made. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:48 am
Jon Reginald Gray, Judge.Counsel for Appellant: Michael Eugene Pritchett.Counsel for Respondent: Arthur Benson and Jamie K. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 12:35 am
” Peter Preston argues that the hard cases of press self-regulation and royal charters are what matter now as the years since Leveson go by. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 10:23 am
When a lead agency finds a project approval to be categorically exempt from CEQA, this determination at the initial step of CEQA’s multi-tiered process necessarily includes an implied finding that no exceptions to the categorical exemption are applicable. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 10:48 am
Arthur A. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:30 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 2:04 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal (Div. 1) held in a published opinion filed October 24, 2018, that CEQA Guidelines § 15164 validly establishes an addendum process that is consistent with the CEQA statute, implementing and filling gaps in Public Resources Code § 21166. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 4:47 pm
In an opinion originally filed June 28, and later certified for partial publication on July 22, 2019 (upon the request of the California Building Industry Association), the Second District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition challenging a project converting a vacant former apartment building into a boutique hotel in Los Angeles’ Hollywood area. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm
In a lengthy, partially published opinion filed January 12, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 3) partly affirmed, but in large part reversed, the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate directing the City of Los Angeles to set aside its FEIR certification and approval of BNSF Railway Company’s (“BNSF”) project to construct a new intermodal railyard facility, near the Port of Los Angeles, to handle containerized cargo transported through the ports of… [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:44 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
”[3] In fact, as an historical matter, Wiener was quite wrong. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 5:40 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 5:06 pm
The same couple, Arthur Smelt and Christopher Hammer, was previously unsuccessful in a federal suit challenging the Defense of Marriage Act and the prior California marriage initiative. [read post]
27 Apr 2019, 1:01 am
As for Grant, he didn’t stop caring about the fate of freed blacks, but he was no longer in a position to act directly on the matter. [read post]
