Search for: "U.S. v. Smart*"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 2,391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2014, 9:59 pm
In the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:50 am
Those of us following the Nokia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
The first Nokia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:58 pm
Last week a diverse group of industry leaders, creatives, academics and a former U.S. copyright chief submitted amicus curiae briefs in support of a reversal of the district court's ruling on the Android-Java copyright infringement case. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 10:16 pm
Both were admitted for use in open court during the first Oracle v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 10:22 pm
In Carpenter v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:16 am
In the first Nokia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:35 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 2013 U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
In U.S. federal court, it's not impossible but certainly rather difficult to satisfy the eBay v. [read post]
Samsung presents legal argument against 'manifest injustice' that would result from Apple's proposal
17 Sep 2015, 6:51 am
" (emphasis added) The Federal Circuit said so in its mid-2013 Fresenius decision and based this holding on "[t]he Supreme Court's decision in Simmons Co. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:31 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:17 am
The U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:02 am
An example is the authors’ discussion of U.S. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 8:29 am
In particular, they are coordinating some of their defensive efforts against InterDigital, a U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 9:08 pm
The trial court erroneously sided with Google in 2012, but it's pretty clear now that the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit will reverse and remand.In Apple v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 10:36 am
Nokia agreed, and the court gladly adopted the proposal (German courts don't manage cases through imposed consolidation the way their U.S. counterparts do). [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:53 am
"This actually shows there was quite some awareness of Qualcomm's position that those products infringe (though Qualcomm apparently wasn't sure of its position; otherwise it would have allowed the court-appointed expert to look at Qorvo's chipset schematics, which Qualcomm had actually obtained for that very purpose in a U.S. discovery proceeding.I guess Qualcomm's contempt motion is going to result in either no fine or in a small fine (assuming that Apple will have… [read post]
