Search for: "Wages v. State"
Results 1721 - 1740
of 8,409
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2007, 8:33 am
Mark Danner's powerful address on the Iraq War, noted by Marty below, prompted me to reflect on an essential difference between how our leaders wage war and how it was done in the medieval days, as described by Martin van Creveld (in The Rise and Decline of the State):Having defeated their rivals by one method or another, the monarchs soon began to change the way they did business and presented themselves to the world. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 7:57 pm
Trial Court did not Err in Holding that Class Counsel owed Duty to Absent Class Members to Represent them in Collection of Judgment, not merely through Obtaining Judgment, Particularly in Light of Defendant-Employer’s Lack of Assets and Possible Bankruptcy Filing California Appellate Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action in California state court against their employer, West Coast Digital GSM, alleging labor law violations; specifically, the class action complaint… [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:51 am
The case is Entila v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 9:15 am
On April 29, 2011, in Cortes v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 12:30 pm
(See Burns v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 11:53 am
To read the Court’s opinion in the case, Astrue v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 6:21 am
We have previously written in this space about the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:38 am
In Etheridge v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:00 am
Breathless, the Third Circuit Court held that an arbitration provision in an exotic dancer’s independent contractor agreement did not encompass her statutory FLSA and state wage-and-hour claims. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 4:04 am
Supreme Court's decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:10 am
In Crymes v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 7:00 am
In the recent case of Wal-Mart v. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 11:41 am
In 1984, the court published Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:54 pm
The FWC’s reasoning The FWC concluded that the fundamental elements of an employment relationship were not present, stating that a contract of employment is a work-wages bargain[3], which requires a correlative obligation between the contracting parties, whereby the employee, on one side, performs the work required by the contract, and the employer, on the other side, pays for the work performed. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:50 pm
Keep in mind, also, that you must pay at least the state minimum wage to your domestic employee, and she may even qualify for overtime.Contact: Tracy Turoff216.615.4829tturoff@ralaw.com [read post]
23 May 2014, 8:54 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 5:09 am
Johnson v. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 7:45 pm
The case, titled Solis v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 3:00 am
Henry v. [read post]
