Search for: ""citizen's united""
Results 1741 - 1760
of 3,970
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2010, 1:52 pm
One of the standard arguments put forward by critics of the Supreme Court's decision protecting corporate political speech in Citizens United is that people aren't entitled to constitutional rights when they use corporate resources because corporations are "state-created entities. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:46 am
Kennedy was Citizen United's author. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:22 am
Clement contended that the appeal in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 11:06 am
Citizens United also does not disturb the validity of the anti-circumvention interest. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:23 am
In January 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:34 am
The data are important in showing the indirect effects of the Citizens United ruling and subsequent court and FEC decisions. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 11:19 am
In 2010, the Supreme Court ruled in Citizens United that unions, groups, and nonprofit corporations had a First Amendment right to spend as much as they wanted on political campaigns. [read post]
1 May 2012, 1:01 pm
Besides the amicus brief filed by Citizens United, another such brief — urging the Court to accept the case for regular review at its next Term — was filed last week by Free Speech for People and other advocacy organizations, arguing that the facts on which the Court based its 2010 ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:52 pm
Among other arguments, they urged the Court not to consider developments in campaign finance since the Court’s 2010 ruling that is centrally at issue: Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm
The Supreme Court decided in Citizens United that corporations could intevene to influence elections--giving money and aide to their selected candidates. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 1:57 pm
After Citizens United v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 5:01 am
Citizens United is unlikely to settle the question, given how sharply the four dissenters and many outside commentators have disagreed with the majority. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 2:05 pm
Citizens United removed spending restrictions on corporations and unions in the name of the First Amendment.” Here’s the question and response from the survey: [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:10 pm
The brief would support the position of Montana Attorney General Steve Bullock that his state can maintain restrictions on corporate campaign money despite the Citizens United ruling….The statement said Bullock supported DFA’s efforts, quoting him as saying that the Citizens United decision “opened the door to unlimited corporate spending in our national elections, and state and local elections could be the next to fall. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:40 am
The most far-reaching example of the Roberts court’s pro-business bias was Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm
Back in April, this blog boldly predicted that the United States Supreme Court would exert little effort in dismissing the State of Montana’s effort to convince us that the Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:07 am
The judge writes: “Again, for better or worse, Citizens United held that the First Amendment treats corporations and individuals equally for the purposes of political speech. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 7:47 pm
’”) (citing Citizens United, 130 S. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 2:49 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 12:06 pm
Here is the abstract: In Citizens United v. [read post]
