Search for: "Block v. State" Results 1741 - 1760 of 9,510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2018, 1:00 pm
On Thursday night, a federal court blocked Arizona from enforcing a law requiring state contractors to certify that they are not participating in boycotts of Israel. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Cormac Early
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 10:38 am by Joshua Cossin
First, they noted that the “Supreme Court recently stayed a similar injunction from our sister circuit” in Trump v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 6:00 pm by Lorna Jaynes
Father’s parents moved from Sacramento to a residence three blocks from the family’s home in Roseville a year later, and Grandfather became the child’s primary caregiver. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 12:25 am
This was the question tackled by the Kluwer Patent Blog, which takes a look at emerging forensics methods in the PRC, which aim to make the process of collecting evidence in China slightly easier and more cost efficient.Right to be forgottenIPWatchdog looks at the global implications of Google v CNIL, which addressed requests for de-referencing (or 'the right to be forgotten'), with the case ultimately ruling that de-referencing only need be carried out on versions of the… [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:07 pm by NARF
Perez (Cultural Resources; Native American Graves Protection Act) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2022.html Matter of Welfare of Children A.J.J. ( Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act) In re M. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 3:19 pm
The Supreme Court, continuing its practice of acting on one case at a time as death-row inmates seek  to block execution by lethal injection, ruled on Monday that it did not have the authority to review a challenge in a Mississippi case that came up from state courts. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:04 pm
TradeComet was forced to file the lawsuit when Google refused to stop engaging in predatory conduct to block search traffic by imposing massive, unjustified price increases. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:40 pm by Holland & Hart
” This provision, section two of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), was not at issue in the 2014 Supreme Court case of United States v. [read post]