Search for: "Roman v. Roman"
Results 1741 - 1760
of 2,150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
The case is Latimer v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 1:57 pm
German princes wrote to King George V, offering to substitute themselves for the kaiser. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down its decision in Electronic Privacy Information Center v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
(rescheduled before the February 15, 2019 and February 22, 2019 conferences; relisted after the March 1, 2019, January 10 and January 17 conferences; likely relisted after the January 24 conference) Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
" Just like in Roman Catholic Diocese v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 9:43 am
U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
(relisted after the June 13 conference) Returning Relists Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan, Puerto Rico v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 1:03 pm
In Lake v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 2:17 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am
JGE v The Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 Court of Appeal held (by 2-1 majority) that the High Court was right to find that a Bishop can be vicariously liable for the sexual abuse committed by a priest within that Bishop’s diocese (despite a lack of an actual employer-employee relationship, as is usually necessary for vicarious liability) Hussain, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 1952… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:18 am
Burnip v Birmingham City Council & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 629 Provision of housing benefit to severely disabled claimants was too low and therefore discriminatory, rules High Cour [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:46 am
They were also distinguishable from Bryson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:23 am
Alright, so in terms of case law on this area, the one that we’ll put on the show notes is the Sopinka v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Roman Cath. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 7:08 am
No Island of Sanity: Paula Jones v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 9:23 am
Alright, so in terms of case law on this area, the one that we’ll put on the show notes is the Sopinka v. [read post]
6 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
New Jersey had a charitable immunity law that protected the Roman Catholic Church from compensating its victims of sexual abuse. [read post]
