Search for: "State v. Items of Property" Results 1741 - 1760 of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2006, 12:54 am
If newsfeeds are not displayed on the screen try going to http://www.law.com/newswire/ and searching for the items of interest. TODAY'S STORIES - December 20, 2006 Race-Based Programs May Face Final Curtain in Supreme Court Legal Times In 1954, William Coleman Jr. sat next to Thurgood Marshall as he argued Brown v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 2:32 am by Rebekka Thomas (Bristows)
In this case, the complainant did no more than fill in the VeRO form, stating that it was the IP owner (or its agent), that it believed in good faith that the identified listings offered items which were not authorised by the IP owner or which were infringing the IP owner’s rights, and that it believed this declaration to be true and in accordance with English law. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
This weblog has been existence for getting on for 12 years and many people erroneously assume that it was the first intellectual property weblog. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
See id.; see generally Cox Operating, L.L.C. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 3:49 am by Peter Mahler
Ho v Yen, which I previously featured in my recent Winter Case Notes edition, involved an LLC formed by its three founding members in 2014, without a written operating agreement, for the purpose of acquiring and developing a property located in Flushing, New York. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 10:25 am by Susan Brenner
And as Wikipedia notes, to be valid, a consent to search property (or seize property) must be given “freely and voluntarily”, since it’s a waiver of your 4th Amendment rights. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 1:59 am by Eleonora Rosati
He went on to find that earlier pages in the sales process, including the full product details page, also targeted the UK, not least because that page stated “This item ships to the United Kingdom”. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:57 pm by Michael Atkins
As the Supreme Court has stated, ‘unless an intellectual property right such as a patent or copyright protects an item, it will be subject to copying. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am by jonathanturley
If it was given, the question becomes whether the compensation is repaid with interest and then the state would have to pay the current owners for the property before giving it back to the earlier owners. [read post]
North Dakota11 required out-of-state sellers to collect and remit sales/use tax on retail sales of certain tangible personal property and services only if the seller had “physical presence” with the state. [read post]