Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1741 - 1760 of 9,477
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2022, 6:16 am by Levin Papantonio
Nearly ten years ago, in 2013, the United Nations adopted a resolution designating July 30 as World Day Against Trafficking in Persons. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm by James Goodman
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group; Med America; Mark Alderdice; Robert Buscho, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (No. 12-16514) (April 8, 2015). [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:58 am by Dennis Crouch
  “A mark is famous if it is widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:09 pm by Elisabeth R. Connell
Morris of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a notable opinion in the case of Rosenberg v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 4:15 am
Newcomer Barilla had become the highest selling brand of pasta in the United States by the early 2000s, which motivated Barilla to seek registration of the subject mark. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 6:20 am by Riana Harvey
This was quickly dismissed by the Judge, stating that the Hearing Officer had properly concluded that there was a low degree of conceptual similarity and that no point of law was to be found there.Turning to the second Ground of appeal, it was submitted that the independency principle had not been applied properly as per Canon v MGM. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:31 pm by Tamara Marie Carson
  Since 2016 marks the 50th anniversary of the landmark decision Miranda v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
United States, concerns the "safety valve" provision in federal criminal sentencing laws. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 5:00 am by Aren Sharifi
The United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third party derivative suit pursuant to Fed. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Redistricting — which is "primarily the duty and responsibility of the State" (Perry v Perez, 565 US 388, 392 [2012] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Growe v Emison, 507 US 25, 34 [1993]) — is a complex and contentious process that, historically, has been "within the legislative power . . . subject to constitutional regulation and limitation" (Matter of Orans, 15 NY2d 339, 352 [1965]). [read post]