Search for: "West v. United States" Results 1741 - 1760 of 3,800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
* The IPKat weblog and the European Patent Office: some points of clarificationMerpel and you need to talk.* Offering a service is not use in commerce Under Lanham Act, says Federal Circuit Court Blogger and recent guest Kat Marie-Andrée Weiss explains the ruling in David Couture v Playdom, a Federal Circuit's decision that highlights a difference of approach between the trade mark law of the United States and that of the European Union as regards the… [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm by Katherine Pompilio
The Supreme Court has voted to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 1:53 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: From 2002 to 2009, the United States Supreme Court decided three cases directly bearing on one of the most notable, or perhaps notorious, examples of American exceptionalism — state judicial elections. [read post]
19 May 2011, 7:47 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, of extraterritorial jurisdiction principles at issue in a case called United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:08 pm by Brett Trout
West holds over 40 United States, and over 200 International, patents on microphones and microphone components. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:06 pm by Peter Vickery
The former, said the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts last month in Martin v. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 7:08 am
He stopped short of saying Britain would support Antigua's complaint claiming the United States was acting in a protectionist manner however. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:01 am by Thomas McAvity
West Asset Management, Inc. and the United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2015, 12:38 pm by Elina Saxena, Cody M. Poplin
” One farmer told Amnesty researchers that Kurdish forces threatened to tell the United States that his family was Islamic State if he did not leave his home. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:41 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
But, might makes right, so the United States Supreme Court used the Federal Arbitration Act — which expressly allows states like West Virginia to invalidate arbitration agreements “upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract,” language routinely ignored by the Supreme Court — and overruled the West Virginia Supreme Court, thereby requiring the patently unfair clause be enforced. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]