Search for: "In re: David B." Results 1761 - 1780 of 2,292
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2007, 7:24 am
This may be true in the first term of a presidency, when one assumes a) that a president will wish to run for re-election and b) that a president will behave as a "rational actor" and shape actions around the prospect of appealing to voters. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 10:10 am
With respect to this "Good Samaritan" analysis, however, we're looking at a case of outright abuse, not mere imprecision. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:30 am by Elena Chachko
(b) Within 30 days of the verdict becoming final [this is an error in translation. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:10 am by Alex Loomis
§ 949a(b)(3)(D), and that rule of evidence and law violate the confrontation clause. [read post]
1 May 2009, 8:21 am
Combating corruption in economic life is more on the minds of Rakesh Khurana and Scott Snook at Harvard Business Publishing for Managers this week in their Manifesto for B-Schools. [read post]
7 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And I think for a while there was better compliance, but then things slipped and we’re back here. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
Clocktower Law LLC (Clocktower) conducts conflict-of-interest checks for each new client. b. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
On 3 November 2016, Sir David Eady gave judgment in the libel damages assessment of Undre v London Borough of Harrow ([2016] EWHC 2761 (QB)). [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:01 am by Schachtman
In granting a Rule 702 motion to exclude the expert witnesses who relied upon a DPA, the trial judge rejected the probativeness of DPAs, based upon the FDA’s rejection of such analyses for anything other than signal detection.[3] In the Accutane litigation, statistician David Madigan attempted to support his fatally weak causation opinion with a DPA for Crohn’s disease and Accutane adverse event reports. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Retain all appellate judges, then vote David Wecht for Superior Court and Kathryn Boockvar for Commonwealth Court. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm by Narine Bagdassarian
  Nelson had re-titled the article to read “Owner-occupants will get first shot at buying foreclosures”. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
But in a New York federal courtroom last Friday, B of A was a big loser. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 5:09 am
” — David Swire “McCain declines to put net neutrality into law. [read post]