Search for: "Law v. State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 156,945
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
The test for successive-writ retroactivity comes from the AEDPA (or from state law). 28 USC § 2255 contains the limitations on successive and out-of-time federal writs: A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:58 pm
In a recent Florida case, Davila v. [read post]
8 May 2017, 2:05 pm
State v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:42 am
Back in 1998, in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:34 am
When the law of two or more states could possibly apply to a legal dispute, the courts are called upon to make a “choice of law” decision as to which state’s law to apply. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:34 am
When the law of two or more states could possibly apply to a legal dispute, the courts are called upon to make a “choice of law” decision as to which state’s law to apply. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:34 am
When the law of two or more states could possibly apply to a legal dispute, the courts are called upon to make a “choice of law” decision as to which state’s law to apply. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
Last week, the court of appeals decided State v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 8:12 am
The dataset records state laws in all fifty states and the District of Columbia over the last several decades. [read post]
18 May 2021, 9:25 am
On 10 May 2021, the Supreme Court heard the appeal in R (Majera) (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (“SSHD”). [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
United States, 45 Harv. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 6:30 am
Tanner Allread, Stanford University, has posted The Specter of Indian Removal: The Persistence of State Supremacy Arguments in Federal Indian Law, which appears in the Columbia Law Review:In the 2022 case of Oklahoma v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 6:53 am
Supreme Court as oral arguments begin today in the case of South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 12:01 am
Nixon v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 2:26 am
Nnyanzi v United Kingdom (Application No 21878/06) European Court of Human Rights “There was no reason to belive that an applicant who unsuccessfully sought asylum, on the basis of her father's political activities in Uganda, would be ill treated on her expulsion to that state. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The same constitutional challenge was made in 2014 in State v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:20 am
The following contribution to our Shelby County v. [read post]
