Search for: "Powers v. State" Results 1761 - 1780 of 37,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2018, 1:12 pm by Adam Levitin
The Supreme Court handed down a disastrous antitrust opinion in Ohio v. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:43 am
"This plain statement rule is nothing more than an acknowledgment that the States retain substantial sovereign powers under our constitutional scheme, powers with which Congress does not readily interfere. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Bruce Ackerman
United States decision to its early en banc decision in Eli Shifa v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 7:18 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Co. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* See Matter of Barella v State of New York Off. of Mental Health, 175 AD3d 495, citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* See Matter of Barella v State of New York Off. of Mental Health, 175 AD3d 495, citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471. [read post]
26 Jul 2006, 12:53 pm
Washington's State Supreme Court upheld a ban on gay marriage Wednesday, July 26, 2006, saying lawmakers have the power to restrict marriage to unions between a man and woman. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:22 am by Ackerman Law Office
In Illinois, our governor has expressed some desire to limit union power in with respect to state employees. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Bank of the United States (1824) and Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States (1833). [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:26 pm
A third argument involves Congressional powers. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:40 pm
That judgment, now nearly two centuries old, is Judge Thomas Ruffin’s infamous slavery-law opinion for the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:40 pm by Christine Corcos
That judgment, now nearly two centuries old, is Judge Thomas Ruffin’s infamous slavery-law opinion for the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]