Search for: "Speed v. State"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 4,300
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2024, 4:00 am
State Abortion Laws Tracker After Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 6:31 am
Young, 13-95 (whether a state can forfeit application of the Stone v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 11:49 pm
In Air Couriers International v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 3:17 am
That opinion overturned Roe v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:48 am
In Gizaw v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 5:03 am
Barton: Next Congress Will Focus on Online Privacy EU wants stronger online privacy rules Air Force warns against location-based app Australian Mobile Telecommunications Assocation LBS Guidelines Data Quality/Liability Google Tool May Have Had Wrong Polling Place Faulty GPS tells soldiers in Afghanistan they are in Africa National Security/Law Enforcement State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:30 pm
The key Maryland cases regarding the reasonableness of a strip search are State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
In State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 4:28 pm
The state's burden of proof disappears.Which brings us to State of Ohio v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:52 pm
Young 13-95Issue: (1) Whether the state forfeits an argument that Stone v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
A finding of infringement is a finding that a monopoly granted by the state is to be enforced. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 4:46 pm
Litigation broke out between Huff and the Wards when Huff installed speed bumps in the driveway to prevent the Wards from speeding through, and the Wards responded by destroying the speed bumps. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:28 am
NIHL is the result of an external insult speeding up a natural process which occurs with ageing”. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 2:48 pm
The Court hadn’t “deferred to an agency interpretation under Chevron since 2016,” in Cuozzo Speed Technologies v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 6:57 am
In Panzera v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
“In 1989, this Court considered a claim against the State in Sweeney v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 4:05 am
(Connecticut was also the first state to adopt a speed limit restriction for cars − a blazing 12 MPH). [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
