Search for: "State v. High" Results 1761 - 1780 of 31,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V A fugitive criminal shall not be surrendered under the provisions hereof, when, from lapse of time or other lawful cause, according to the laws of either of the surrendering or the demanding country, the criminal is exempt from prosecution or punishment for the offense for which the surrender is asked. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 10:30 pm by Steve Shiffrin
The post also appears on balkinization The religious right purports to be deeply concerned about the high rates of abortion in the United States, but its most stalwart proponents have succeeded in implementing and maintaining policies that keep the abortion rate high. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:41 am
By all accounts, oral argument before the Supreme Court in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 3:37 pm
GONZALES, No. 05-547, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, click Download cooper_martin_virtue_lopez_05547.pdf Three... [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 2:05 pm
And Kansas courts have prohibited inconsistent verdicts in bench trials, see State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:08 pm
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Tariquez-Zaman v London Deanery of Post Graduate Medical and Dental Education [2008] EWCA Civ 1226 (06 November 2008) PS (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1213 (06 November 2008) SK (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1204 (06 November 2008) Blackburn & Anor v West Midlands Police [2008] EWCA Civ 1208 (06 November 2008) RA (Sri… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:27 am
The High Court decision in Alberta v Katanga dealt with two separate questions that are of interest. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:02 pm by Sme
Levinski (10th Cir., June 29, 2015) (affirming Rock's dismissal because her right to free speech did not overcome Levinski's concern that those in high-ranking policy positions should "speak publicly with a single voice on policy matters")MiscellaneousUnited States v. [read post]
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Nolan & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 671 (04 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Solicitors Regulation Authority v Lawrence & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 421 (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) (30 March 2012) Aziz v Lim [2012] EWHC 915 (QB) (05 April 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Rouse Tout A Tout, R (on… [read post]