Search for: "State v. Waters"
Results 1761 - 1780
of 9,937
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2019, 5:54 am
In Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 7:48 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 7:09 pm
Wednesday, sinking in approximately 25 feet of water. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 1:28 pm
The court’s full ruling in State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 3:21 am
In State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 8:29 am
On August 27, 2010, the Court of Civil Appeals released their opinion in the Water Works Board of the City of Birmingham v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:52 pm
Moore v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 2:14 am
The Fifth Circuit yesterday, in the Nationwide v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 6:01 pm
Grand Ledge responded that the statute explicitly excludes municipalities, like Grand Ledge, that serve less than 1% of the State’s population, and that the actual cost requirement applies only to water department customers, not suppliers. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 4:44 am
United States (Federal Trust; Water Rights) Upper Lake Pomo Association v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 5:16 am
In Guam v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:52 am
" The case, Arizona v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 8:30 am
Resolving conflicts between Tribal and state regulatory authority over water. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 9:32 pm
The crew of the 74-foot fishing vessel Privateer called Station Grays Harbor watchstanders via VHF radio channel 16 at 2:26 p.m., stating they were taking on water through an 8-to-12-inch hole and preparing to abandon ship by deploying their life raft and donning immersion suits. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:09 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 11:50 am
I have been hearing for awhile that there is a chance that the South Carolina State Legislature may take action in response to the South Carolina Supreme Court's decision in Branham v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Terry v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:36 am
For example, in Granchelli v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 12:54 pm
Department of Labor v. [read post]
