Search for: "Any Person or Entity Claiming any interest therein"
Results 161 - 180
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Nov 2009, 4:23 pm
(3) For purposes of this section, "health insurance information" means an individual's health insurance policy number or subscriber identification number, any unique identifier used by a health insurer to identify the individual, or any information in an individual's application and claims history, including any appeals records. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 5:12 am
It is noteworthy that the Court preliminarily held that the TLC is not a suable entity because, as an agency of the City of New York, it is not a suable entity., and the NYTWA does not have standing to bring the federal constitutional claims asserted here on behalf of its members these claim because the Second Circuit has held that Section 1983 creates only a personal cause of action, and the NYTWA further failed to demonstrate that it has suffered… [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 2:32 am
While such productions cast little glory on the companies that produce them, I cannot find any authority in the cases to date that permit a court to conclude that allegations of deficiencies in themselves automatically require a forensic search whenever a party claims that there are, for example, fewer e-mails from a person or about a subject or transmitted in a given time than the party expected to find. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:32 am
While such productions cast little glory on the companies that produce them, I cannot find any authority in the cases to date that permit a court to conclude that allegations of deficiencies in themselves automatically require a forensic search whenever a party claims that there are, for example, fewer e-mails from a person or about a subject or transmitted in a given time than the party expected to find. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:32 am
While such productions cast little glory on the companies that produce them, I cannot find any authority in the cases to date that permit a court to conclude that allegations of deficiencies in themselves automatically require a forensic search whenever a party claims that there are, for example, fewer e-mails from a person or about a subject or transmitted in a given time than the party expected to find. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:51 am
If the firm you work for refuses to pay, you will be personally liable for this amount. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:04 am
If the firm you work for refuses to pay, you will be personally liable for this amount. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:02 pm
If the firm you work for refuses to pay, you will be personally liable for this amount. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 3:43 am
In light of the fact that the no-fault regulations do not provide a general definition of the term "applicant," the plain meaning of this term in 11 NYCRR 65-3.9(c) would seem to refer to any entity, whether an injured person or a provider/assignee, who submits a claim or applies to an insurance company for no-fault benefits (see Majewski, 91 NY2d at 583). [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:21 pm
The Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act Of 2005 ("BAPCPA") added a new provision that preserves a consumer’s TILA claims and defenses through the sale of the debt “free and clear” of other interests, as follows:Notwithstanding subsection (f), if a person purchases any interest in a consumer credit transaction that is subject to the Truth in Lending Act or any interest in a consumer credit contract (as… [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 5:00 am
With respect to a claims-made policy, however, the policy may provide that the claim shall be made during the policy period, any renewal thereof, or any extended reporting period, except as provided in paragraph four of this subsection. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:41 pm
No provision contained in any existing or future standstill, confidentiality, or other agreement that, directly or indirectly (A) affects, restricts, or limits the ability of any person to offer to acquire or acquire, (B) prohibits any person from offering to acquire or acquiring, or (C) prohibits any person from using any previously disclosed information in connection with any such offer to acquire or acquisition of,… [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:43 pm
(e) (1) The association records, and any information from them, may not be sold, used for a commercial purpose, or used for any other purpose not reasonably related to a member's interest as a member. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 8:39 am
"Exculpatory clauses are generally valid, and the public policy of freedom of contract is best served by enforcing the provisions therein. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 9:06 pm
Failure to provide a disclosure packet opens the association up to being liable for any actual damages up to $1000.00 for an association managed by a common interest community manager and the association waives any claims for delinquent assessments or current violations of the Declaration existing at the time of the request. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:27 pm
But the Peach State could lay claim to more bankruptcy cases -- and millions of dollars in legal and court fees -- that now end up in U.S. bankruptcy courts in Tennessee. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 5:08 am
Regardless of the number or withholding orders that have been served, the maximum that may be withheld for child support is: Without arrearage 50% with a second family 60% Single With Arrearage 55% with a second family and 12+ weeks in arrears 65% Single 12+ weeks in arrears Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction (CEJ) The doctrine that only one support order should be effective and enforceable between the same parties at any one time and that when a particular court has acquired… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 12:51 am
(3) No entity other than a real estate investment company under this Act shall use the name of “real estate investment company” or any other name confused therewith. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
I then asked a more specific question: Had the U.S. government, as an entity client, consented generally to the disclosure of the information contained therein, and the communications revealed, pursuant to attorney-ethics confidentiality rules? [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 1:21 pm
Regardless of the number or withholding orders that have been served, the maximum that may be withheld for child support is: Without arrearage 50% with a second family 60% Single With Arrearage 55% with a second family and 12+ weeks in arrears 65% Single 12+ weeks in arrears Continuing Exclusive Jurisdiction (CEJ) The doctrine that only one support order should be effective and enforceable between the same parties at any one time and that when a particular court has acquired… [read post]
