Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 161 - 180
of 52,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2022, 3:17 pm
” “The potentially affected products were manufactured by an outside supplier and distributed only to H-E-B and Joe V’s Smart Shop stores in Texas and Mexico,” according to the recall notice. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 1:58 pm
Souter citing Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 6(b)(2)(B) in his dissent in Bowles v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
Timm, a chapter 7 case, is frequently disregarded in chapter 13 cases notwithstanding the specific directive of § 1322(b)(2), which states that a mortgage secured by a debtor's home cannot be modified. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
Timm, a chapter 7 case, is frequently disregarded in chapter 13 cases notwithstanding the specific directive of § 1322(b)(2), which states that a mortgage secured by a debtor's home cannot be modified. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:38 am
In the case of Kennedy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:55 pm
Patent and Trademark Office cancelled Rule 41.200(b) as a result of the decision rendered in Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 10:14 pm
§ 2(b)(2) does not extend [...] [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 9:16 pm
[Emerald Partners v. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 6:40 pm
One of the only practical benefits for federalism to emerge out of NFIB v Sebelius was the 3-vote opinion’s strengthening of the limit against Congress’ placing “coercive” conditions on federal grants in Part IV(B). [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am
Golan appealed the District Court’s denial of her Rule 60(b) motion. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 9:13 am
S. ___ (2024). [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 9:09 am
Policemen’s Annuity and Benefit Fund of Chicago, Illinois v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 12:22 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 10:34 am
In Joseph S. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 1:37 pm
State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:13 am
Joined by podcast regular Theresa Cardinal Brown , Cornell Law Professor Steve Yale-Loeher breaks down the Supreme Court’s latest decision to uphold the Biden administration’s deportation priorities in U.S. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:35 am
” * A group of school district retirees also commenced a CPLR Article 78 proceeding to annul the district's decision to discontinue Medicare Part B premium reimbursements (Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:29 am
The standard for getting past a 12(b)(6) Motion in federal court in North Carolina inched higher yesterday with the Fourth Circuit's decision in Francis v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
Susan V. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:05 pm
Yesterday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
