Search for: "B. v. S." Results 161 - 180 of 51,874
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2024, 9:27 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
USCIS Plaintiffs' counsel Brent Renison reports: "The Ninth Circuit has extended the Supreme Court’s interpretation of § 1252(a)(2)(B) in Patel v. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 9:55 pm by Patent Docs
Patent and Trademark Office cancelled Rule 41.200(b) as a result of the decision rendered in Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
Timm, a chapter 7 case, is frequently disregarded in chapter 13 cases notwithstanding the specific directive of § 1322(b)(2), which states that a mortgage secured by a debtor's home cannot be modified. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
Timm, a chapter 7 case, is frequently disregarded in chapter 13 cases notwithstanding the specific directive of § 1322(b)(2), which states that a mortgage secured by a debtor's home cannot be modified. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 6:40 pm by Rick Hills
One of the only practical benefits for federalism to emerge out of NFIB v Sebelius was the 3-vote opinion’s strengthening of the limit against Congress’ placing “coercive” conditions on federal grants in Part IV(B). [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:29 am by Mack Sperling
The standard for getting past a 12(b)(6) Motion in federal court in North Carolina inched higher yesterday with the Fourth Circuit's decision in Francis v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:35 am
” * A group of school district retirees also commenced a CPLR Article 78 proceeding to annul the district's decision to discontinue Medicare Part B premium reimbursements (Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 2:05 pm by Zachary Spilman
Yesterday’s oral argument at CAAF in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 7:13 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Joined by podcast regular Theresa Cardinal Brown , Cornell Law Professor Steve Yale-Loeher breaks down the Supreme Court’s latest decision to uphold the Biden administration’s deportation priorities in U.S. v. [read post]