Search for: "Baker v. Carr"
Results 161 - 180
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2010, 2:29 pm
Ct. 1937 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:58 pm
As we previously noted, in its New decision, quoting Baker v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 11:48 pm
Baker v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:20 am
And yet, as we argue in this Essay, the Court’s handling of the problems since its initial intervention in Baker v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:03 am
Sullivan), the right to vote (Baker v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
"I'm not so sure that this is true, and I didn't have to strain to come up with a counter-example: Felix Frankfurter, appointed by FDR, voted to uphold the expulsion of Jehovah's Witnesses who refused to pledge the flag at school; voted with the minority in Baker v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 2:17 am
Carr and Roe v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
I also discuss the case of Carr v. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 10:26 am
On the issue of the political question doctrine, the Fifth Circuit applied the standard test articulated in Baker v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:35 am
Baker v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 5:39 pm
In Baker v. [read post]
29 Dec 2008, 6:30 am
As an initial matter, a majority of the Court has only employed the political question doctrine twice since 1964 (the year Baker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:37 am
Carr. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 4:55 am
Baker said. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 7:41 pm
Carr, which led to Gray v. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 9:31 am
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), the case that essentially applied Baker v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 5:42 pm
As Judge Jenkins noted, Baker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 10:40 am
The court evaluates competing cases on the issue, and even finds that the six factors used in evaluating whether the case concerns a political question, enumerated in Baker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:02 am
In this action, California seeks damages against several major automakers on the grounds of state and federal public nuisance law.The District Court dismissed on the ground that the case raises non-justiciable political questions, with a particular focus on the third factor of Baker v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 7:54 am
Carr. [read post]
