Search for: "Bexis"
Results 161 - 180
of 402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2010, 6:15 am
Everyone knows we prefer Garcia (where Bexis filed an amicus brief) to Desiano - and that overall Garcia's been winning.We're pleased to say that the streak continues. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 11:05 am
It's an unpublished opinion, which is both unfortunate (it's not binding precedent) and fortunate (meaning that plaintiff didn't come anywhere close to proving a case).The grounds for affirmance in Scelta: (1) no expert testimony that the Mirapex label was inadequate; (2) no causation because the prescribing doctor knew full well about the purported risk, having conducted two studies on that precise subject (we note the citation of one of Bexis's Bone Screw… [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 6:22 am
Since Bexis is in Philadelphia and Herrmann's in Chicago, whistle real, real loud.) [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 12:19 pm
Bexis observes that of all the law blogs started up by practicing lawyers at about the same time as Drug & Device Law, only little ol’ CalBizLit (Est. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:04 am
Herrmann brought the crystal ball; Bexis brought the beer and chips.) [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:00 am
PTC has hired Bexis' firm to handle the appeal in this case, so Bexis now has a conflict of interest. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:45 am
despite Bexis letter brief in Conte laying out the parade of horribles. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am
Bexis knows. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:37 am
Bexis came up with the idea. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:50 pm
It’s been a number of years, but once Judge New granted judgment n.o.v. in one of Bexis’ cases. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 5:41 am
[The prescriber's] lack of memory, of course, does not preclude the possibility that she had read these materials, but neither can it sustain [plaintiff's] burden.Slip op. at 8.Fortunately, there's no heeding presumption in prescription drug cases in Texas, courtesy of a Herrmann/Bexis collaboration by the name of Ackermann v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:49 pm
Jan. 26, 2006).Years ago - before blogging - Bexis represented a non-manufacturing defendant in Baycol litigation. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:36 pm
Suffice it to say that part of the process involves Bexis and a cauldron. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 8:34 am
As for 2014, Bexis is posting his annual Best Of and Worst Of lists. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:33 am
When Bexis returns from vacation, which despite rumors is not a two-week law-library crawl, we can be sure that this decision will be added to our generic preemption and branded/generic scorecards. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:30 am
(Bexis points out that Canada is also responsible for the rock groups Rush and BTO. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 1:47 pm
Bexis is updating chapter 4 of his book, which includes a thorough discussion of negligence per se. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:51 pm
This one should be enough, as Bexis really gets going. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
While the court may have been concerned with the defense’s argument, Bexis became uber-concerned with the court’s ruling, particularly its conflation of the express-preemption concept of a “parallel violation” and the implied-preemption basis for Mensing. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 4:30 am
Naturally, Bexis had the most to say. [read post]
