Search for: "Bird v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 1,283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Nov 2021, 11:15 am by Denis Stearns
So let’s look at this case that Ronholm cites—American Public Health Association v. [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am by Richard Hunt
National Bird is a myth, and I’m not willing to get into the politics of the annual pardoning of turkeys by the President, so here instead are the latest ADA and FHA decisions. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
This post surveys the pro/con social science evidence presented in the amicus briefs in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
” On October 4, 2021, the Fish and Wildlife Service promulgated a final rule revoking a January 7, 2021 rule that narrowed the scope of the provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act which applied to conduct resulting in the incidental death of birds protected by the Act. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Group, Inc., 30 NY3d 288, 298 [2017]; AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am by Florian Mueller
In the meantime, there would already be a decision from Texas on the FRAND compliance of Ericsson's royalty demands.Alston & Bird again: The lead attorney and first signatory under the new Ericsson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
  He is unpersuaded that the post-Shevill case law should be reversed but suggests that, in addition, a “focalisation” principle should apply, using the context of the statement in question to determine which Member State’s jurisdiction is the most appropriate. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 6:00 am by Elin Hofverberg
International trade in Appendix-III species is only allowed with proper permits or certificates from relevant authorities, per article V of the Convention. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“A violation of Judiciary Law § 487 requires an intent to deceive (see Judiciary Law § 487), whereas a legal malpractice claim is based on negligent conduct” (Moormann v Perini & Hoerger, 65 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]). [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:35 am by Unknown
State of Washington (Trust Land; Tribal Sovereign Immunity; Jurisdiction) Western Watersheds Project v. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 3:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hindsight arguments concerning selection of one of several reasonable courses of action do not state a viable cause of action for malpractice (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 667 [2017]). [read post]