Search for: "Bruce Ackerman"
Results 161 - 180
of 427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
King’s assassination was the catalyst for House consideration and passage of the Senate version; ironically, I cited Bruce Ackerman’s Holmes Lectures for their discussion of the impact on civil rights of the assassin’s bullet. [read post]
11 May 2014, 12:30 am
"In The Wall Street Journal there is a review of Bruce Ackerman's The Civil Rights Revolution (Belknap). [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
Supreme Court Might Resolve the Case Even Though Its Decision Probably Won’t Affect the Colorado Presidential Primary Election BallotPart Two: The Three Possible, but Less-than-Ideal, Dispositions of the CasePart Three: Two Important Things All the Parties Get Wrong, and One Other Important Thing They Don’t AddressBruce Ackerman Misunderstands My Point About What Colorado is Doing and May Do [UPDATED to respond to Bruce's follow-up post]Part Four:… [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
Bruce Ackerman's theory is an originalist theory, as he himself has said on more than one occasion. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:14 pm
That said, this piece by Bruce Ackerman makes a fine argument against the executive action, though that is not its intent. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:58 pm
Contemporary constitution-making processes have resolved the separation of powers dilemma in unexpected and innovative ways (See: Bruce Ackerman, New Separation of Powers, 113 Harvard Law Review 633 (2000); Cindy Skach, Newest Separation of Powers, 5 International Journal of Constitutional Law 93 (2007)). [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:38 pm
The interviews conducted with Bruce Ackerman, Jules Coleman, Drucilla Cornell, Charles Fried, Morton Horwitz, Duncan Kennedy, Catharine MacKinnon, Richard Posner, Austin Sarat, and Patricia Williams cover a wide breadth of contemporary legal theory — including law and economics, critical legal studies, rights theory, law and philosophy, critical race theory, critical legal history, feminist theory, postmodern theory, and law and society. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 2:12 pm
The article quotes Bruce Ackerman's LRB column on the matter (available here) as follows:"The promise of democratic legitimacy is a sham," wrote Bruce Ackerman, a professor of law and political science at Yale, in The London Review of Books. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Now, laments Yale Law School’s Bruce Ackerman, legislators see lame-duck sessions as a time to consider serious measures free of political accountability. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:14 am
Bruce Ackerman has feared a “decline and fall of the American Republic,” given that escalating power struggles between the branches of government could leave “the military as a potential arbiter” (85). [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 5:03 pm
Ian Ayres and Bruce Ackerman have an op-ed and blog post with a different, quite interesting proposal: Making federal contracts contingent on contracting corporations agreeing not to engage in electioneering speech--sort of a contractor analogue to the Hatch Act prohibitions on government employees. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:43 am
Featuring some of America's finest legal minds--Cass Sunstein, Bruce Ackerman, Robert Post, Harold Koh, Larry Kramer, Noah Feldman, Pam Karlan, William Eskridge, Mark Tushnet, Yochai Benkler and Richard Ford, among others--the book tackles a wide range of issues, including the challenge of new technologies, presidential power, international human rights, religious liberty, freedom of speech, voting, reproductive rights, and economic rights. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 12:59 am
See, for example, Bruce Ackerman's Op Ed from last year. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 10:40 am
In particular, it is hard to account for the extraordinary increase in presidential power that Arthur Schlesinger has described as the “imperial presidency,” and which is critiqued in Bruce Ackerman’s most recent work, simply in terms of formal amendments and judicial precedents. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:58 am
In the course of doing so I also say a few things about my ongoing exchange with Bruce Ackerman over legal interpretation in the executive branch. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 7:09 am
Responding to the administration's torture policies and other human rights violations, Jack Balkin and Bruce Ackerman have suggested two approaches. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 12:30 am
Since the book's release we've noted several reviews of Bruce Ackerman's We the People: Vol. 3: The Civil Rights Revolution (Harvard University Press). [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 7:29 am
It’s a path of course well explored by Bruce Ackerman along with other scholars including yours truly.By contrast, originalists tend to take the problem of informal constitutional change so seriously that they wind up condemning all significant developments outside Article V as illegitimate. [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 1:29 pm
I doubt that even Bruce Ackerman intended it to be used as a prescriptive tool, justifying the intentional strong-arming of existing rules and procedures so as to achieve a desired result. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:59 pm
(Tribe's article was a response to an article by Bruce Ackerman and David Golove, and the particular issue that separated them was whether NAFTA was invalid because not a treaty. [read post]
