Search for: "Buchanan v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
It is hardly surprising that politicians are sometimes opportunistic rather than principled. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
This would not be possible without the hard work of our multi-state team composed of Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Bruce Buchanan and myself, John Gihon. [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
This would not be possible without the hard work of our multi-state team composed of Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper, Bruce Buchanan and myself, John Gihon. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:50 pm
The rule from that case has been adopted into the law across the United States, and it is now the basis for section 351 of the Restatement (2d) of Contracts. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
” It will be: “I didn’t lose, no matter what the evil press and the deep-state conspiracy says. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 5:20 am
(See, among a zillion examples, anti-miscegenation laws after Loving v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 5:00 am by Neil H. Buchanan
Is the United States still, as I recently put it, a “Dead Democracy Walking”? [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The question of unions’ role in American life found its way into the Supreme Court earlier this month, in the case of Friedrichs v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Because Democrats have passed laws in some states to protect the status quo, should the Supreme Court—freshly packed by Republicans with extreme ideologues—turn the question of abortion rights back to the states by overturning Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Although there is no reason to expect that we will know the results of the election immediately, we at least know that the voting will end tomorrow evening. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
”Similarly, the Republican Secretary of State in Georgia has thus far stood up to the bizarre call for him to step down from that state’s two Republican senators, but he might yet do so. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:01 am by Amy Howe
  Cheever pushes back against the state’s reading of Buchanan v. [read post]