Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US "
Results 161 - 180
of 7,794
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2013, 3:32 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 5:06 pm
Indeed, the disclosed information need not even satisfy the legal requirements of confidentiality set out in Slavutych v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:03 am
A casual observer might reasonably wonder what magic a protective order works that allows outside counsel access to confidential information to advance the case without countenancing untoward uses by the client. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 9:43 pm
A recent decision by the Connecticut Supreme Court (Byrne v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 3:43 am
In Vestergaard Frandsen and others v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
The criminal-communications exclusion to privilege (and, I have argued, to solicitor-client confidentiality – Understanding Lawyers’ Ethics in Canada (2011) pp. 114-115) excludes information communicated to the lawyer which is in itself criminal, or which uses the lawyer’s services to further a criminal purpose. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 7:35 am
Merely warning a former employee and his/her new employer not to make use of the former employer’s “trade secrets and confidential information” may be insufficient to hold the new employer accountable for such employee’s transgressions, at least according to one New Jersey federal district court. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 11:16 am
I hope that the Supreme Court does not use NASA v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:19 am
Michelin had disclosed confidential information. [read post]
5 May 2022, 2:00 am
Usachenok v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 8:00 am
In a December 2016 decision in Wadler v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 6:01 am
As the use of social media in business continues to grow, companies will face new challenges with respect to the protection of their confidential information and business goodwill, as several recent federal district court decisions demonstrate. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 2:39 pm
Facts In Henderson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 3:14 pm
In Reid, the State prosecuted a case where a company alleged that a former employee was stealing its proprietary information using a confidential Internet password. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court held more than a decade ago in Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 6:18 am
In Capital City Church of Christ v. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 6:05 pm
The decision, United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
Excluding the use of confidential information in future, related matters was also proper. [read post]
1 May 2010, 6:14 am
See generally Laurie Kratzky Dore, Secrecy by Consent: The Use and Limits of Confidentiality in the Pursuit of Settlement, 74 Notre Dame L.Rev. 283 (1999). [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm
It also prohibited any publication of any information likely to lead to revealing the identity of Venables or Thompson, or any information which was likely to identify their whereabouts in the past, present or future. [read post]
