Search for: "Case v. People" Results 161 - 180 of 51,831
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2008, 8:31 am
Coleman v Attridge Law (a Firm) and Another Case C-303/06 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The prohibition of direct discrimination against and harassment of disabled people in employment, provided for in the Community disability directive, was not limited to employees who were themselves disabled but extended to unequal treatment and harassment of a non-disabled employee for reasons connected with the disability of his child. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 2:00 pm by Unreported Opinions
Briefly, Youhong Zhang loaned money to three people. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 1:00 am by Anita Davies
In the case preview for R v Gnango , it was suggested that the question facing the Supreme Court read like a particularly complex examination problem. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
The Supreme Court has given judgment in Patmalniece v SSWP [2011] UKSC 11, a case which required consideration of what constitutes direct discrimination on nationality grounds under EU law and, in cases of indirect discrimination, whether a concern to prevent “ social tourism” is a justification which is independent of nationality. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant relied on the cases of People v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:12 pm
In this post, I wrote about then-Judge Sonia Sotomayor’s excellent opinion in the very similar case of Krimstock v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Guaman Court Discusses Whether the Judicial Hearing Officer at a Suppression Hearing was Biased The defendant was charged with two counts of driving while intoxicated DWI and one count of aggravated driving while intoxicated. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 6:57 am by Jamie Abrams
Here are excerpts from Lambda's press release describing the case: The lawsuit, Wilkins v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by INFORRM
In these cases there may be only a limited role for the opinion or attitude of right-thinking members of society, because the required standard will usually be one that is set by the professional body or a regulatory authority; b) Imputations upon a person, firm or body which may deter other people from providing any financial support that may be needed, or from accepting employment, or otherwise dealing with them. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 9:11 am
The California Supreme Court issued its decision yesterday in the long-awaited case of People v. [read post]