Search for: "Cato v. State" Results 161 - 180 of 1,099
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:33 pm
Lopez) or to provide a civil remedy in federal court for gender-motivated violence (per United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 8:59 am
But he moves on to his big point, using the Supreme Court's new Second Amendment decision -- District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Supreme Court has now agreed to hear a much-watched Wisconsin case, Gill v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At ACSblog, Bidish Sarma discusses Packingham v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Supreme Court should step in to protect freedom of association against California’s push to obtain donor identities for controversial groups [Ilya Shapiro and James Knight on Cato certiorari amicus brief in Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Review and clarification by high court sorely needed [Ilya Shapiro, Trevor Burrus and Patrick Moran on Cato amicus brief in Evergreen Freedom Foundation v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Smith, and others; Halbrook on the Court’s decision to hear New York State Rifle and Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 6:33 am by John Jascob
Cato claims injury because a specific gag order prevents it from publishing an entrepreneur’s account that he was the victim of an overzealous SEC investigation (Cato Institute v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:19 pm
The Cato Institute has filed an amicus brief supporting the petitioner in Empress Casino Joliet Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
“Trump promises ‘massive permit reform’ in infrastructure bill” [Melanie Zanona, The Hill] Murr v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Ilya Shapiro and David McDonald describe the background of the Eighth Circuit case of Niang v. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
“Why It Was Proper (and Necessary) to Overturn Old Precedent” [Ilya Shapiro and Aaron Barnes, Cato, earlier on Janus v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
And now, citing the First Amendment and the Janus precedent, “three conservative lawyers are seeking to overturn Texas laws that require attorneys to join the State Bar of Texas and pay annual dues;” in Texas, as in many states, bar dues go to various ideologically fraught issues and causes [Chuck Lindell, Austin American-Statesman] Just for fun: Cato’s amicus brief in Janus v. [read post]