Search for: "Does 1 - 10"
Results 161 - 180
of 43,793
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2013, 7:59 am
The fact that Velez was a confidential information does not mean as a matter of law that he had a special relationship with the police." [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 11:32 am
”[10] In Mobil Oil v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 7:21 am
John Doe-1, John Doe-2, John Doe-3, John Does 4-10, Ustream TV Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 6:30 pm
In the most recent Buffalo AILA / CBP Liaison meeting held on August 20, 2008, the Buffalo CBP office has confirmed that an applicant does not need to be en route to his or her place of business as a condition of applying for an L-1 or TN at the border port-of-entry. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Here are some reasons that make mediation so attractive for Massachusetts personal injury claimants: 1) it is relatively inexpensive (roughly $500/side for a half-day); 2) it is confidential; 3) it is relative quick, and does not last for many days, unlike jury trials; 4) it allows both sides, with the help of a neutral, to see and realize the strengths and weaknesses for both sides; 5) it is non-binding (either side can walk out if unhappy,… [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 3:10 am
1. [read post]
"Electronically Printed" Does not Include Automated Merchant Email -- Shlahtichman v. 1-800 Contacts
17 Aug 2010, 3:30 pm
[Post by Venkat] Shlahtichman v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc., Case No. 09-4073 (7th Cir.; Aug. 10, 2010) The Seventh Circuit recently concluded that the words "electronically printed," as used in the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, does not include a computer generated email receipt sent by a merchant. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:37 pm
Also included as defendants are unnamed does 1-10. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:49 am
In In re BitTorrent Adult Film Copyright Infringement Cases, Magistrate Judge Gary Brown has ordered the Doe #1 defendants to show cause at a hearing why their identities should not be divulged to the plaintiffs.Notice and Order to Show Cause dated August 10, 2012 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 10:00 am
& Tax J. 1 (2009). [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:47 am
But what does that mean for MySpace, which is the No. 1? [read post]
26 May 2023, 3:30 am
If an individual terminates the earlier-commencing plan (i.e., the earlier-commencing plan does not end by its terms and without any action by the individual), when can trading begin under the later-commencing plan? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 6:30 am
Strainis-Walker One of the questions we are most frequently asked by small employers is about the so-called “Rule of 10”; i.e., the long-perpetuated myth that OSHA does not have jurisdiction over employers or workplaces with fewer than 10 employees. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 7:24 am
1. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:13 am
John Does 1-10, supra. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:54 am
Does 1-300, No. 10 C 6255, Slip Op. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:43 am
§ 1326(a)(1), (a)(2), (b)(2).HELD: Drugging by surreptitious means does not involve use of physical force. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:24 am
Unnecessarily spinning one’s tires does not justify a stop. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 12:18 pm
that this informant does not even exist or that it was the informant version of what we jokingly referred to in the early 70's as a "Mississippi Search Warrant".FN1) 1. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:27 am
July 10, 2009).* The court made this observation in n. 1: Indeed, Officer Arnold testified that the police had mulled obtaining an anticipatory search warrant, but decided to wait and see what happened at the scene. [read post]
