Search for: "Duck v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 752
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2010, 8:44 am
The eBay case is an odd duck because there is no takeover threat. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
While West Virginia courts may choke on the words, we aren’t the only ones willing to call a duck, a duck. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
The New York State 2022-2023 Budget[1] amendment QQ updated the State’s approach to freshwater wetlands regulation. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Since even the Dukes panel had been uncomfortable with the class action-punitive damages issue, we could have the outliers whittled down to one, that being the West Virginia Supreme Court's ducking the issue in State v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 4:09 am
State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 11:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
Why exactly they are ducking any confrontation is open to debate - particularly as these same lobbies helped get us into the crisis, for example, by opposing regulation of derivatives. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 8:21 am
The classic example was Naim v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 3:21 pm
If the case name Sackett v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:41 am
Medical monitoring is an odd-duck (we would say illegitimate) tort because it's almost 100% dependent upon a particular procedure - the class action - for its existence. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 7:13 am
Ridley Park Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:43 pm
., Petitioners v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
" Mitchell completely ducked "office under the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
It was United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2022, 9:07 am
Capitol, lame-duck President Trump demanded Section 230’s repeal. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 9:21 pm
Now in Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 11:47 am
But the State will obviously argue that although a duck, she is not part of the State’s flock of ducks. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 3:34 pm
Still, one might develop a number of interesting Bickelian arguments for why the Justices should consider ducking this issue right now and taking it up only if and when this case goes through state and federal habeas review. [read post]
